When the Mind Becomes Critical

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Pusilon deretso?

Dominique Nicole Flores of the Philippine Star reported: One of the three victims in the Antipolo road rage altercation-turned-shooting died a day after the incident, city police chief Lieutenant Colonel Ryan Manongdo confirmed on Monday, March 31, 2025.

The road rage incident occurred around 5 p.m. on Sunday, March 30, of this year when 28-year-old suspect, known by the alias “Kenneth,” was seen in multiple videos circulating online pulling out a gun after a fistfight.

Netizens quickly directed their anger towards the riders involved, while others who were outraged by the shooting condemned the shooter for resorting to such extreme measures, especially given that he also wounded his own wife. However, some individuals shifted their perspective after seeing the earlier part of the video, which also went viral on social media, leading to a shift in public opinion.

This raises an important question: Why are some people so deeply invested in social media posts? Can their judgment be swayed by what they see without taking the time to fact-check? And if so, what are the potential consequences of adopting this kind of mindset?

Several studies have explored the impact of social media on judgment and decision-making. For instance, Fogg et al. (2003) highlighted how easily users are influenced by online content, often without verifying its accuracy. This phenomenon is further discussed by Pennycook and Rand (2018), who found that individuals are more likely to believe misinformation on social media if it aligns with their pre-existing beliefs, especially when fact-checking is not prioritized.

Are their judgments and opinions influenced by their ability to engage in critical thinking?

Critical thinking allows people to assess information more thoroughly, question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and consider alternative perspectives. When individuals lack strong critical thinking skills, they may be more susceptible to biases, emotional reactions, and misinformation, which can distort their judgment. On the other hand, those who actively apply critical thinking are more likely to make informed decisions and form well-reasoned opinions, as they are better equipped to filter out unreliable or misleading information.

Amid the challenges educators face in fostering critical thinking in the classroom, they are confronted with a significant threat: the social environment itself often lacks these skills. At home, where many parents treat their mobile phones as extensions of their lives, critical thinking may take a backseat. With constant exposure to quick, hasty judgments and misinformation online, parents may inadvertently model poor decision-making for their children. In such an environment, attempting to cultivate critical thinking skills in learners may feel like a futile effort, as the foundation for these skills is often absent at home.

Videos of road rage and other violent content will keep circulating, drawing in viewers who are constantly exposed to them. Over time, this endless stream of disturbing material can numb people, making them less sensitive to the impact of what they’re seeing. Instead of sparking thoughtful reflection, these videos can desensitize audiences, normalizing harmful behavior and dulling their ability to critically engage with the world around them.

Crimes Amongst the Young

 

                                                (image: youtube.com)

Magkamatay na dajon…

Inquirer.net reported on March 28, 2025: A grade 8 male student fatally stabbed his classmate with a kitchen knife after an argument at a high school in Parañaque City.

In a DWLA radio interview, Parañaque City assistant police chief Lt. Col. Eric Angustia said the incident arose from a disagreement between the 15-year-old suspect and the 14-year-old victim. It started when the suspect borrowed make-up from the victim without her permission. That’s why they argued.

In a statement also on Thursday, the Moonwalk National High School said it was cooperating with authorities in its investigation, adding that the incident was an “isolated” case.

These news stories often leave readers and the public in a state of disbelief, as it's almost impossible to comprehend the depth of hatred that young people can harbor so intense that it leads them to take another person's life.

If this behavior stems from bullying, what might be the underlying environment of these young individuals at home? Are they subjected to domestic violence to such an extent that its impact spills over into their school lives, influencing their actions in the classroom?

Studies suggest that children who witness or experience household violence may internalize harmful behaviors, which can escalate into bullying or even violent acts toward others (Evans, Davies, & DiLillo, 2008). This exposure not only disrupts their emotional development but also affects their ability to regulate anger and form healthy relationships, leading to destructive patterns that extend beyond the home (Jaffe, Wolfe, & Wilson, 1990).

Violence is prevalent across virtually all social media platforms, and its pervasive nature can have a cascading effect on individuals exposed to this content. Many so-called "content creators" have even started to view violence as a tool for engagement, often prioritizing sensationalized or harmful content to attract attention. As a result, these disturbing portrayals not only thrive but continue to fuel a cycle of negativity and aggression online, influencing the behavior and mindset of viewers.

The mind should remain free from the corruption of violence. Parents have a crucial role in nurturing love, care, and empathy, and they must serve as the primary protectors of their children, safeguarding them from harmful media content that promotes violence. As the first line of defense, parents must actively monitor and guide their children's exposure, fostering a healthy environment that shields them from the damaging effects of violent portrayals in the media.

By-Products of What?

 

                                             (image: youtube.com, abs-cbn news)

Sa una mga bomba films man adto…

Janvic Mateo of the Philippine Star reported on March 22, 2025: Vloggers Krizette Laureta Chu, who claimed being an editor of a big newspaper, Mary Jane Quiambao Reyes and Mark Lopez were subjected to thorough scrutiny by lawmakers investigating the spread of fake news and misinformation through social media.

The house probe was initiated in response to the widespread dissemination of fake news across social media platforms, allegedly propagated by vloggers who are said to have political affiliations with a prominent figure. These individuals are accused of spreading misinformation with the primary intent of sowing discord, confusion, and distortion of facts, which could ultimately contribute to the corruption of public perception and the manipulation of public opinion.

Some have expressed concerns that these investigations could result in the suppression of free speech and the infringement of individuals' right to express their opinions.

During the Martial Law years in the Philippines, “bomba” movies emerged as a form of both release and rebellion, offering a means of expression amidst the suppression of basic freedoms. Scholars argue that these films, characterized by their bold sexual content and subversive themes, served as a cultural outlet for the Filipino people, allowing them to silently resist the political oppression of the time (Bautista, 2001; Quindoza-Santiago, 1998).

Despite being heavily censored, bomba films provided a space for individuals to confront and process the socio-political climate, often using suggestive narratives to critique the authoritarian regime (Sison, 2003).

In this way, bomba cinema became a powerful tool of resistance, reflecting the frustrations of a society under strict control and offering a subtle yet potent form of protest against the stifling of free expression.

Lino Brocka, along with other filmmakers, was imprisoned during Martial Law in the Philippines primarily due to his outspoken political views and his films' social critiques. He was a vocal critic of the government's human rights abuses, censorship, and the suppression of freedom of expression.

In an era where the internet connects us all, can we view the rise of fake news, memes and unfounded weblogs as a symptom of underlying societal unease? From a Social Science perspective, these phenomena may stem from a variety of factors, including widespread distrust in traditional media, political polarization, and the increasing fragmentation of information sources.

The spread of misinformation is driven by echo chambers, where people only see content that matches what they already believe, making divisions and confusion worse.

An affluent individual once subtly remarked to this writer, *“I keep quiet about social issues to avoid getting caught up in the mess.” This statement raised a red flag, as it starkly contradicted the deeply held belief that we live in a democracy where expressing our opinions is not only a fundamental right but a responsibility.

Of course, spreading lies and false information is undeniably wrong, but attempting to silence or coerce others into withholding their ideas and opinions is a byproduct of an oppressive and controlling mindset. Such actions undermine the very principles of free expression and foster an environment of fear and conformity.

It is the responsibility of the House of Representatives to initiate actions in aid of legislation, but the House must exercise great caution in navigating the fine line between serving the greater good and pursuing personal interests. Their actions should always prioritize the welfare of the public, ensuring that decisions are made with integrity and accountability, rather than being driven by ulterior motives.

Vloggers and bloggers must recognize the responsibility that comes with expressing their ideas. It’s not enough to simply share what they feel; they must also consider what is ethically and factually right. Before voicing their opinions to the vast audience of the internet, they should be mindful of the laws of the land and the application of universal values, ensuring their content is not only truthful but respectful of the broader societal impact.

In fact, the word fake news is an oxymoron. The combination of these two words creates a contradiction, as true news should be based on factual accuracy, while "fake" inherently undermines that truth.

InTact

 

                                                  (image: youtube.com)

Jaon lagi usahay masobrahan an mga sulti…

Cebu Daily News reported on March 13, 2025: The online frenzy over former President Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest by the International Criminal Court (ICC) intensified when political scientist and media personality Richard Heydarian compared Mindanao to Sub-Saharan Africa.

This sparked an outpouring of criticism from netizens in the Mindanao area, who wasted no time in lambasting the media personality. The backlash quickly escalated, with memes and other humorous content flooding online platforms, mocking the seemingly degrading "analysis" put forth by the figure in question.

Heydarian later shared another video clarifying that his previous remarks had been misunderstood. He explained that he made the comparisons in order to help the international community grasp the context, as terms like *barangays* and *sitios* might not be familiar to a global audience. He emphasized that his intent was to provide a clearer perspective for those outside the Philippines to understand the complexities of the situation.

But what is really the Sub-Saharan Region?

Sub-Saharan Africa refers to the region of Africa located south of the Sahara Desert, encompassing a diverse range of countries, cultures, and ecosystems. It is characterized by a complex interplay of geographic, economic, and social factors. The region includes various climates, from tropical rainforests to arid deserts, and has some of the world's most biodiverse areas.

Economically, Sub-Saharan Africa faces numerous challenges, including high poverty rates, limited access to education, and political instability (Moyo, 2009).

Upon reviewing the description, it seems that the analyst’s comparison could have some merit. However, one might wonder: what triggered such a strong reaction from the people of Mindanao?

This writer's reflection focuses on the untimeliness of Heydarian's comments, made when the people of Mindanao were still reeling from the shock and pain of recent events involving their revered leader. His remarks appeared to deepen the wound, adding insult to injury at a time when sensitivity and empathy were most needed.

The personality became TACTLESS. Tact involves understanding the appropriate choice of words and timing, ensuring that communication is sensitive, considerate, and respectful of the situation or the audience. It’s about being diplomatic and using discretion when expressing thoughts or opinions, particularly in delicate or challenging situations.

While it’s true that we have the right to express our opinions and ideas in a democracy, exercising this freedom requires a thoughtful balance between honesty and sensitivity. Applying tact means communicating our views in a way that respects others' perspectives and emotions, ensuring that our words are both truthful and considerate, especially in delicate situations.

Does he deserve the online backlash? This is a reality that all vloggers and bloggers must acknowledge. While the freedom to share content on the internet is a right, it also comes with the understanding that others are equally free to express their opinions—whether positive or negative. When you post for a global audience, you must expect that people will react openly, sharing their thoughts and critiques just as freely as you share your own.

This is why journalism should be studied thoroughly, or at the very least, understood before one takes on the role of an online personality. Concepts like libel, plagiarism, proper writing techniques, syntax, tact, coherence, and the principles of crafting newsworthy stories must be fully grasped in order to apply them effectively.

Otherwise, gobbledygook takes place.

Blurred Lines and Societal Implications

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Vlogger na ta tanan.

The appeal of META's monetization options for videos and posts has led many to consider vlogging as a serious pursuit. This shift includes educators who have now adopted the role of "influencers," spending considerable time shooting, editing, and posting their videos on platforms like Facebook.

Filipinos have a strong tradition of sharing stories with friends and family, a cultural phenomenon that extends beyond borders. We view ourselves as deeply interconnected, which is why we enjoy sharing the details of our daily lives, not only with fellow Filipinos but also with foreigners.

Several studies have examined the cultural significance of sharing stories and maintaining interconnectedness among Filipinos. Nolasco (2012) explores how Filipinos use social media to express and share their identities, highlighting the importance of online self-representation. Bautista (2004) discusses the Filipino value of social connectedness and its impact on communication practices, emphasizing the sharing of personal stories.

Teachers and other educators are also engaging in this practice, with some noting that it serves as a way to alleviate stress.

But what happens when vlogging blurs the line between educating the young and becoming overly consumed by the process, causing individuals to lose sight of their primary key responsibility?

This led the Schools Division of Zamboanga del Sur to issue DM 124, s. 2025 on March 5 of this year, titled "Adherence to Professional Conduct in Classrooms – Prohibition of Video Recording and Vlogging During Class/Office Hours." The memorandum emphasizes the importance of ensuring that learners are not included in any vlogs, recordings, or social media content related to personal activities. It also underscores the need to prioritize the structured and uninterrupted delivery of lessons.

Sison (2020) emphasizes the potential risks of involving students in online content, noting the need for safeguards to protect privacy and ensure focus on educational objectives. Additionally, the work of Cruz and Tan (2017) suggests that teachers' use of social media for personal purposes during class hours can distract from their professional duties, which may impact their effectiveness in the classroom.

Looking at the wider scope: Can vlogging be considered a "blue ocean" for us, offering new opportunities in a time when inflation looms daily, threatening the stability of our future? Who can blame people for turning to this appealing and accessible opportunity when even basic needs, like health insurance, are not a government priority?

Sociologists believe that people's actions are often driven by specific stimuli. The growing mass interest in vlogging may be a response to the challenges of the times, with the activity serving as both an escape and a potential opportunity to access better resources or improve one’s circumstances.

According to Pineda and Santos (2019), individuals often turn to digital content creation as a means of coping with economic uncertainty, viewing it as a way to generate income and gain social recognition. Similarly, research by Dela Cruz (2020) suggests that vlogging has become a form of escapism for many, offering a creative outlet amid personal or societal difficulties.

Legislators must carefully consider these studies and emerging phenomena to craft more effective laws that can improve the lives of Filipinos and mitigate the effects of inflation. Attention must also be given to the well-being of the disadvantaged, including teachers, to ensure that the educational system is strengthened and can better serve the needs of the nation.

Yet, some legislators remain skeptical of research. One even said: Baliw na baliw kayo sa research. Aanhin niyo ba yung research?

Political Embrace

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Hain da jaon tagalong na mag serbisyo…

Delon Porcalla of The Philippine Star reported on January 6, 2025: Three government agencies are now in the process of fine-tuning an efficient system where beneficiaries of the government’s Ayuda Para sa Kapos ang Kita (AKAP) Program will be totally free from the influence of either national or local politics.

This is the “move” of the government to insulate AKAP from politicians according to Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), the lead agency for the distribution of the financial aid to the near poor; Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA).

Critics label AKAP, TUPAD (Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers) and AICS (Assistance to Individuals in Crisis Situation) as "dole-outs" when they believe the programs create dependency rather than empowering people to earn sustainable incomes.

There’s also concern that some politicians use these programs for "patronage politics" -giving aid selectively to gain loyalty or votes, rather than based on real need.

Patronage politics refers to a system where political leaders distribute resources, jobs, or favors to supporters in exchange for political loyalty. This practice often involves appointing individuals to government positions based on their allegiance rather than merit, aiming to consolidate power and maintain control. It's a prevalent feature in various political systems, influencing governance and public administration.

Studies have examined the dynamics and implications of patronage politics. For instance, Grzymala-Busse (2008) discusses how political parties utilize state resources for patronage, affecting democratic accountability and state functioning. Similarly, Kopecký et al. (2012) analyze party patronage in democracies, highlighting its impact on political competition and public trust.

This reflects self-serving tactics that prioritize personal gain over the collective good, gradually undermining the quality of government services. Once deeply embedded in the system, it risks shaping a dangerous precedent, leading future generations to perceive such practices as the accepted norm.

Studies have shown that patronage politics in the Philippines often leads to self-serving practices that undermine the quality of government services. Hutchcroft (2012) notes that local politicians prioritize distributing patronage resources to their constituents over delivering essential public goods, resulting in uneven service provision across regions.

When self-serving practices overshadow genuine public service, the very foundation of democracy is weakened, fostering a culture where political loyalty is rewarded over competence and merit. If left unchallenged, this cycle of favoritism and corruption risks becoming ingrained as a societal norm, perpetuating inequality and diminishing the people's trust in their leaders.

A relentless cycle of instability and poverty will inevitably unfold.

Being Stoic

 

                                                    (image: youtube.com)

Di ibutang sa boot…

The world is in a perpetual state of outrage. With every passing second, a cascade of events unfolds at the tip of our fingertips. This relentless stream of information provokes emotional responses, and without vigilance, one’s mental well-being can easily be compromised.

According to Smith et al. (2023), the pervasive nature of online content accelerates emotional contagion, where unchecked reactions spread quickly across social networks. This unrelenting influx of stimuli, if met without emotional regulation, can significantly impact mental well-being.

Jones and Taylor (2022) highlight that the brain's constant engagement with distressing content heightens anxiety levels, reinforcing a cycle of stress and reactivity.

The principles of Stoicism emphasize detaching oneself from emotional entanglements. By disregarding what lies beyond one’s control and focusing solely on what can be governed, individuals cultivate inner stability. This shift in perspective reduces psychological turmoil, allowing the mind to navigate life’s uncertainties with greater clarity and resilience.

Stoicism is an ancient philosophical school founded by Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century BCE, emphasizing self-control, rational thinking, and the pursuit of virtue as the highest good (Sellars, 2018). At its core, Stoicism teaches that individuals should focus on what lies within their control—such as their thoughts, actions, and responses—while accepting external events with equanimity, as they are beyond one's influence (Williamson, 2020).

This philosophy promotes emotional resilience by advocating for detachment from destructive emotions and fostering inner peace through reason and discipline (Robertson, 2019). By mastering their internal world, Stoics believe that people can achieve tranquility and moral integrity, regardless of life’s adversities.

Marcus Aurelius, Seneca, and other Stoic philosophers assert that by practicing Stoicism, one can cultivate inner peace by preventing emotions such as envy, anger, and the countless feelings we experience daily from overpowering reason. Through disciplined thought and mindful detachment, they believed that true tranquility arises not from the absence of emotion but from mastering one’s responses to it.

By adopting a Stoic mindset, people can cultivate emotional resilience, reduce anxiety, and respond to life’s uncertainties with clarity and composure. In a world brimming with noise and outrage, Stoicism serves as a powerful tool for achieving balance and maintaining psychological well-being.

Books like The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday and Stephen Hanselman, How to Think Like a Roman Emperor by Donald Robertson, and Stoicism and the Art of Happiness by Donald J. Robertson have become bestsellers, reflecting a growing interest in applying Stoic principles to modern life. This resurgence highlights how people seek timeless wisdom to navigate the complexities of today’s turbulent world—managing stress, fostering emotional resilience, and finding clarity amidst chaos.

The pursuit of a peaceful life rests within each individual’s grasp. As Marcus Aurelius once said, 'You have power over your mind—not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.' By choosing to focus on what truly matters and releasing unnecessary emotional burdens, we create space for more meaningful moments.

In mastering this balance, we lessen the weight of turmoil and embrace a life of clarity, purpose, and inner calm.