Personalities On Virtual Spaces

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Hurot na brodkaster..

In an era dominated by social media, the power to express one's thoughts and opinions has never been more accessible. Anyone, regardless of background, can broadcast their ideas—whether insightful or misguided—across digital platforms. In many ways, this represents the true essence of freedom of expression. However, there are times when these spaces become filled with trivial, and even inappropriate content, prompting us to question why such virtual space is often wasted.

While some argue that we should simply mind our own business, pointing out that these are *their* personal timelines, the reality is that these posts often spill into our own news feeds, intruding upon the digital landscape we navigate daily. This creates a tension between the freedom to share and the burden of being constantly bombarded by content that can feel irrelevant or even disruptive.

Social media platforms inherently empower individuals by giving them a platform for expression. However, this empowerment can lead to overreach, where users post irrelevant or harmful content, believing that their views hold intrinsic value simply because they can share them (Andreassen, 2017).

Similar to our actions in real life, individuals often reveal aspects of their personalities through their behavior in the digital scene. By utilizing the online space as an avenue for self-expression, our posts, interactions, and choices of engagement provide meaningful insights into our character and values.

Big Five personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) found that these traits significantly shape how individuals use social media. For instance, extraversion is positively associated with frequent social media use and information sharing, while neuroticism may discourage sharing due to anxiety or insecurity. This aligns with broader trends in understanding digital self-expression as an extension of personality traits.

A meta-analysis revealed that extraversion and openness are positively related to sharing information on social media, as these traits encourage engagement and exploration. Conversely, conscientious individuals share less, likely due to cautiousness in sharing potentially irrelevant or disruptive posts (Zheng et al.,2023).

Sharing ideas or posting visual content online is inherently neutral and often beneficial, provided it is done with consideration for others' feelings and well-being. Equally valid is the choice of individuals to remain silent or limit their participation in online discourse.

However, the issue arises when these behaviors are driven by skewed or negative intentions, such as spreading misinformation, inciting conflict, or undermining others. In such cases, these actions become a clear indicator of problematic dynamics and warrant careful attention.

Engaging in a thoughtful self-assessment of the motivations behind our posts is crucial for fostering meaningful and responsible online interactions. If the reasons for posting are unclear, it’s wise to pause and reflect first before sharing.

Like The Movies

 

                                                (image: youtube.com)

Magsalida na!

It appears that congressional hearings "in aid of legislation" have evolved into something resembling an entertainment streaming platform, akin to Netflix. People now tune in to these sessions, not necessarily for their legislative purpose, but for entertainment or other personal reasons. Some viewers believe these hearings offer a chance to affirm their support for the politicians they’ve chosen, gaining reassurance through the spectacle.

However, a pressing question remains: How much taxpayer money are these representatives expending to produce these increasingly theatrical encounters?

In year 2000, the House of Representatives also allocated a P5-million budget for the prosecution of then-impeached ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, who just opted for resignation. That amount was based on a similar budget for the impeachment of then-president Joseph Estrada. With the present budget, of the house of representatives for their hearings, they refused to disclose (Horfilena, 2024).

There are also instances where the theatrics of certain politicians reveal their power tripping intentions.

As hearings are broadcasted to a wide audience, some politicians seem to prioritize personal or party gain over the responsible use of power, adopting combative or dramatic tones to captivate viewers and rally supporters. Critics argue that such performances undermine the legislative process, as they turn serious matters of governance into a spectacle aimed at garnering media attention and strengthening political influence (Greenberg, 2021; McCarty, 2020).

But there are also those who fail and become the objects of ridicule.

In their attempts to dominate the spotlight or score political points, these individuals often resort to sensationalism, making statements or engaging in behaviors that seem more suited for a reality show than serious governance.

Their actions not only undermine the credibility of the hearings but also diminish public trust in the legislative process, reducing it to a spectacle rather than a meaningful forum for debate and decision-making.

Since the proceedings are often shared on social media, politicians frequently find themselves lambasted and ridiculed by netizens. Their actions, whether driven by good or bad intentions, are subject to intense public scrutiny, and the digital age ensures that no moment goes unnoticed.

This heightened visibility exposes them to both praise and criticism, with the latter often amplified by viral posts and memes. Ultimately, this is the price they must pay for using the public platform of legislative hearings, where every gesture and remark can be dissected and shared with millions.

R. L. Baym and S. L. Jones (2011) conducted a study that underscores how moments from legislative hearings or other public political events are frequently subject to comedic reinterpretation, which can diminish the credibility of politicians. It explores the role of political satire in shaping public opinion, noting how humor and ridicule of politicians, often driven by viral social media content, can influence voter perceptions and trust.

Crocodiles have become a popular metaphor among the public to describe certain grandstanding politicians,

This imagery is so vivid that it could inspire a captivating movie concept, reminiscent of the iconic Planet of the Apes franchise. Here, a producer can film The Rise of the Planet of the Crocs.

War Tactics

 

                                                     (photo: youtube.com)

Former President Rodrigo Duterte reacted sharply on Wednesday to Gabriela party-list Rep. Arlene Brosas' questioning during the 11th House quad committee hearing on his war on drugs. Brosas insisted that Duterte answer with just a "yes" or "no." Duterte responded, "You are not an investigator. Why are you asking me to answer yes or no? Are you a police officer?"

At times, the audience laughed and clapped, which annoyed some of the lawmakers. Rep. Castro, visibly upset, said, "This is not a joke!"

                                                                ***

Politicians being aligned with the popular will of the people is a fundamental aspect of democratic governance.

In the study “Political Legitimacy in the Modern State” by David Beetham (1991), he posited that political legitimacy is largely derived from public support. When politicians align with the popular will, they maintain the legitimacy of their rule, as citizens are more likely to trust institutions and leaders who reflect their preferences.

Duterte won the presidential race with 16,601,997 votes. This implies that 38.5% of the those who voted in the 2016 elections believe on his advocacies and platforms.

When politicians stand against the popular will, they risk a wide range of negative consequences, including eroding legitimacy, provoking public unrest, increasing political polarization, and facing electoral punishment.

Since many of these politicians view themselves as "brands," they feel the need to constantly "sell" their image to the public. In some cases, this has allegedly led them to resort to unethical tactics, such as buying votes, in order to secure a place in the race for popularity and power.

Smith’s (2003) research on political conflict suggests that sometimes, attacking or undermining a popular figure can backfire and end up strengthening their position. Popular politicians often enjoy the "victim" status when they are attacked, which can generate sympathy and consolidate their base of support.

Making an enemy of a very popular politician carries significant risks, from damaged reputation and electoral consequences to political isolation and the strengthening of the opponent's position. Such actions can trigger media scrutiny, increase polarization, and lead to party discipline problems.

The conflict can also escalate into a personal battle, distracting from important political issues and reducing the challenger’s ability to govern effectively. While politicians may engage in such confrontations for strategic reasons, the risks involved often outweigh the potential benefits, particularly if the popular figure enjoys deep public loyalty and influence.

This writer is NOT suggesting for the political leaders to keep safe and stop making stands. Politicians who stand against popular sentiment often pay a high price in terms of both their political careers and the stability of the broader political system.

Was it Lao Tzu who wisely advised that, before stepping onto the battlefield, one must first understand their enemy?

It’s wiser to seek a more thoughtful solution than to let your emotions take over, only to risk becoming a laughingstock.

 

Taking Responsibility

                                                 (image: youtube.com)

Nagpasingod na sa pagkaliso…

In addition to the chemical factors and genetics that contribute to mental illness, it is essential for individuals to also understand the psychological causes behind mental health conditions. This awareness enables them to take a more proactive and informed approach to caring for their mental well-being.

CHILDHOOD DEFICITS: whether emotional, psychological, or environmental—can have long-lasting and significant effects on an individual's mental health into adulthood. These deficits often stem from early-life experiences such as trauma, neglect, abuse, attachment disruptions, or a lack of emotional support.

Individuals who experience such deficits are at greater risk for developing chronic mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety, as well as substance abuse problems (Dube et al., 2001).

UNMET NEEDS, particularly during critical developmental stages in childhood and adolescence, can have a profound impact on mental health throughout an individual's life. These needs may encompass emotional, psychological, social, or even physical aspects—such as a lack of nurturing, inconsistent caregiving, or neglect in providing basic emotional support.

When these needs go unaddressed, they can create vulnerabilities in emotional regulation, self-worth, and coping mechanisms, leading to an increased risk of mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and personality disorders (Shonkoff, Boyce, & McEwen, 2009).

INSECURITIES—whether related to self-image, relationships, social standing, or abilities—are closely linked to various mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem. These insecurities often stem from early life experiences, societal pressures, or negative feedback from others, and can shape the way individuals perceive themselves and interact with the world around them.

When a person experiences chronic insecurity, it can lead to a heightened state of emotional distress, as they may constantly feel inadequate, unworthy, or fearful of being judged or rejected (Kernis & Goldman, 2006). This ongoing sense of vulnerability can fuel anxiety disorders, particularly social anxiety, as individuals worry about being perceived negatively by others (Clark & Wells, 1995).

LACK OF AFFIRMATION—whether in the form of praise, validation, or emotional support—can significantly impact mental health, particularly in terms of self-esteem, emotional well-being, and the ability to cope with stress. Affirmation from caregivers, peers, and significant others plays a crucial role in the development of self-worth and emotional security, particularly in childhood.

In the absence of affirmation, individuals may also struggle with social anxiety, as they may come to believe that their value is contingent on external validation. This can lead to heightened sensitivity to rejection, fear of judgment, and difficulty forming close relationships (Leary, 2001).

You may notice someone displaying these behaviors, which often stem from underlying causes they may not even be aware of. Over time, these invisible pressures can lead to a decline in mental health, leaving them struggling to make sense of their own emotions and actions.

When facing mental health struggles, it is essential to first acknowledge and understand our own feelings. If we project these challenges onto others, it can escalate the situation and harm our well-being. 

When Halloween Becomes Real

 

                                                   (image:youtube.com)

Ugsa mag-ajag nan lihok hasta paninggonon.

What goes around comes around. This encapsulates the idea of reciprocity in human behavior and the interconnectedness of our actions. It suggests that the energy we put into the world—whether positive or negative—eventually finds its way back to us.

This cycle reminds us that our choices have consequences; acts of kindness can lead to support in our times of need, while negativity can breed conflict and strife. In a broader sense, it highlights the importance of empathy and consideration, encouraging us to treat others with respect and compassion.

Indeed, this saying serves as a poignant reminder that our interactions shape not only our own experiences but also the lives of those around us.

Negative words or actions can have repercussions.

There are individuals you may harm who appear to keep their cool, unaware that they have turned to something more sinister beneath the surface. Their calm demeanor masks a brewing storm, as they quietly navigate the shadows of their emotions, potentially plotting a response that could unleash unexpected consequences.

This writer was able to study a person who is resorting to make a CURSE, defined as a solemn utterance intended to invoke a supernatural power to inflict harm or punishment on someone or something. Curses can manifest in various cultural contexts, often tied to folklore and belief systems.

Scientific research has explored the psychological and social dimensions of belief in curses. For instance, a study by Dixon et al. (2012) examined how belief in supernatural curses can impact mental health and stress levels, suggesting that the fear of being cursed may lead to heightened anxiety and paranoia. Another relevant study by Murray et al. (2015) investigated the cultural significance of curses in various societies, highlighting their role in social control and moral judgment.

So what happens if someone is silently cursed?

In Stephen King's Thinner, protagonist Billy Halleck faces terrifying consequences after a chance encounter with a mysterious old man leads to a curse that makes him lose weight uncontrollably. This curse symbolizes guilt and the physical manifestation of unresolved sins. As Billy descends into desperation, the novel explores themes of accountability and justice, blurring the lines between victim and villain. King's storytelling reveals curses as reflections of human conscience and the inescapable consequences of one's actions.

A curse transcends mere supernatural punishment; it embodies the intricate relationship between intention and consequence, victim and villain.

Ultimately, curses remind us that our choices resonate beyond the immediate moment, shaping not only our destinies but also the very essence of our humanity.