Political Embrace

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Hain da jaon tagalong na mag serbisyo…

Delon Porcalla of The Philippine Star reported on January 6, 2025: Three government agencies are now in the process of fine-tuning an efficient system where beneficiaries of the government’s Ayuda Para sa Kapos ang Kita (AKAP) Program will be totally free from the influence of either national or local politics.

This is the “move” of the government to insulate AKAP from politicians according to Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), the lead agency for the distribution of the financial aid to the near poor; Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA).

Critics label AKAP, TUPAD (Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers) and AICS (Assistance to Individuals in Crisis Situation) as "dole-outs" when they believe the programs create dependency rather than empowering people to earn sustainable incomes.

There’s also concern that some politicians use these programs for "patronage politics" -giving aid selectively to gain loyalty or votes, rather than based on real need.

Patronage politics refers to a system where political leaders distribute resources, jobs, or favors to supporters in exchange for political loyalty. This practice often involves appointing individuals to government positions based on their allegiance rather than merit, aiming to consolidate power and maintain control. It's a prevalent feature in various political systems, influencing governance and public administration.

Studies have examined the dynamics and implications of patronage politics. For instance, Grzymala-Busse (2008) discusses how political parties utilize state resources for patronage, affecting democratic accountability and state functioning. Similarly, Kopecký et al. (2012) analyze party patronage in democracies, highlighting its impact on political competition and public trust.

This reflects self-serving tactics that prioritize personal gain over the collective good, gradually undermining the quality of government services. Once deeply embedded in the system, it risks shaping a dangerous precedent, leading future generations to perceive such practices as the accepted norm.

Studies have shown that patronage politics in the Philippines often leads to self-serving practices that undermine the quality of government services. Hutchcroft (2012) notes that local politicians prioritize distributing patronage resources to their constituents over delivering essential public goods, resulting in uneven service provision across regions.

When self-serving practices overshadow genuine public service, the very foundation of democracy is weakened, fostering a culture where political loyalty is rewarded over competence and merit. If left unchallenged, this cycle of favoritism and corruption risks becoming ingrained as a societal norm, perpetuating inequality and diminishing the people's trust in their leaders.

A relentless cycle of instability and poverty will inevitably unfold.

Being Stoic

 

                                                    (image: youtube.com)

Di ibutang sa boot…

The world is in a perpetual state of outrage. With every passing second, a cascade of events unfolds at the tip of our fingertips. This relentless stream of information provokes emotional responses, and without vigilance, one’s mental well-being can easily be compromised.

According to Smith et al. (2023), the pervasive nature of online content accelerates emotional contagion, where unchecked reactions spread quickly across social networks. This unrelenting influx of stimuli, if met without emotional regulation, can significantly impact mental well-being.

Jones and Taylor (2022) highlight that the brain's constant engagement with distressing content heightens anxiety levels, reinforcing a cycle of stress and reactivity.

The principles of Stoicism emphasize detaching oneself from emotional entanglements. By disregarding what lies beyond one’s control and focusing solely on what can be governed, individuals cultivate inner stability. This shift in perspective reduces psychological turmoil, allowing the mind to navigate life’s uncertainties with greater clarity and resilience.

Stoicism is an ancient philosophical school founded by Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century BCE, emphasizing self-control, rational thinking, and the pursuit of virtue as the highest good (Sellars, 2018). At its core, Stoicism teaches that individuals should focus on what lies within their control—such as their thoughts, actions, and responses—while accepting external events with equanimity, as they are beyond one's influence (Williamson, 2020).

This philosophy promotes emotional resilience by advocating for detachment from destructive emotions and fostering inner peace through reason and discipline (Robertson, 2019). By mastering their internal world, Stoics believe that people can achieve tranquility and moral integrity, regardless of life’s adversities.

Marcus Aurelius, Seneca, and other Stoic philosophers assert that by practicing Stoicism, one can cultivate inner peace by preventing emotions such as envy, anger, and the countless feelings we experience daily from overpowering reason. Through disciplined thought and mindful detachment, they believed that true tranquility arises not from the absence of emotion but from mastering one’s responses to it.

By adopting a Stoic mindset, people can cultivate emotional resilience, reduce anxiety, and respond to life’s uncertainties with clarity and composure. In a world brimming with noise and outrage, Stoicism serves as a powerful tool for achieving balance and maintaining psychological well-being.

Books like The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday and Stephen Hanselman, How to Think Like a Roman Emperor by Donald Robertson, and Stoicism and the Art of Happiness by Donald J. Robertson have become bestsellers, reflecting a growing interest in applying Stoic principles to modern life. This resurgence highlights how people seek timeless wisdom to navigate the complexities of today’s turbulent world—managing stress, fostering emotional resilience, and finding clarity amidst chaos.

The pursuit of a peaceful life rests within each individual’s grasp. As Marcus Aurelius once said, 'You have power over your mind—not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.' By choosing to focus on what truly matters and releasing unnecessary emotional burdens, we create space for more meaningful moments.

In mastering this balance, we lessen the weight of turmoil and embrace a life of clarity, purpose, and inner calm.

Cupid's Prey

 

                                                 (photo: youtube.com) 

Kahapon da nagkapuliki na pwede man sab kuman…

As of January 2025, the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) warned of a potential rise in "love scams" as Valentine's Day approaches. These scams, according to dzrh.com.ph, often involve perpetrators deceiving individuals into romantic relationships to extract money or personal information.

But why do people so easily fall victim to these scams? Is it the relentless societal pressure to celebrate Valentine's Day with a romantic partner? Could it be the overwhelming influence of commercialism, with businesses aggressively marketing flowers, cakes, and extravagant dining experiences to drive consumer spending? Or perhaps, is it simply that many individuals invest too much emotion in occasions like this, making them more susceptible to deception?

A 2024 survey by the Social Weather Stations (SWS) revealed that 58% of Filipinos described their love life as "very happy," indicating a deep emotional engagement with romantic relationships during this period (GMA News Online, 2024).

This emotional investment is further reflected in consumer behavior; for instance, a 2025 report highlighted that Filipinos are increasingly opting for personalized and experiential gifts over traditional items, suggesting a desire to create meaningful connections through their Valentine's Day celebrations (P&A Grant Thornton, 2025).

However, this heightened focus on the holiday can sometimes lead to financial strain, as individuals may feel pressured to spend beyond their means to express affection, underscoring the complex interplay between emotional desires and economic realities in the context of Valentine's Day.

Filipinos tend to place great importance on celebrations like Valentine's Day due to deeply ingrained cultural values that emphasize love, relationships, and social connection. This focus stems from a collectivist society where relationships - whether romantic, familial, or platonic—are central to one's identity and emotional well-being. Additionally, media and commercial influences amplify the significance of these events, shaping societal expectations around grand romantic gestures and gift-giving.

In the past, only the affluent had the privilege of receiving bouquets of flowers. However, with the growing influence of social media, the practice has become more widespread and normalized. Today, even men are receiving floral arrangements - an act that was once considered unconventional way back then.

These trends also persist due to the pervasive fear of missing out (FOMO), as individuals feel pressured to participate in celebrations simply to stay socially relevant. The desire to have an ideal online presence drives many to engage in these events - after all, what would they post on their social media accounts without photos that align with the occasion?

While expressions of love and affection are natural, allowing emotions to dictate one’s actionsespecially in materialistic or socially constructed celebrations - can lead to unnecessary strain. Stoic philosophy teaches that reason must govern emotions, ensuring that one's happiness is not dependent on external validation or fleeting moments.

By practicing temperance and focusing on what is within our control, we can appreciate these occasions without being consumed by societal expectations or emotional excess.

224

 

                                                  (photo: pep.ph)

Apektado kay bas mahaod sa ila?

Cebu’s The Freeman reported on February 9, 2025: Andi Eigenmann, who has been based in Siargao with Philmar Alipayo and their kids, revealed the reason why she posted the series of cryptic Instagram stories early Saturday morning. She added details to their relationship and how the unidentified woman, whom she called “friend,” affected it.

The news quickly spread like wildfire across social media, seemingly overshadowing discussions on Vice President Duterte’s impeachment. This, in turn, sparked reflection like: Are Filipinos so deeply driven by emotions that events like these become sensational phenomena, consuming their attention?

Filipinos' fascination with celebrity breakups can be attributed to their strong sense of emotional investment in public figures, a culture deeply rooted in collectivism and interpersonal relationships (Joaquin & Biana, 2021). Social media amplifies this engagement, creating a shared emotional experience that fosters discussions, speculations, and even moral judgments (Tandoc & Vos, 2016).

Even as far back as the 1980s, the themes of movies and television dramas—fondly referred to as “telenovelas”- have often revolved around breakups, infidelity, and the profound consequences of being "the other woman." These narratives frequently highlight the emotional turmoil, moral dilemmas, and societal repercussions of extramarital affairs, reinforcing traditional values while captivating audiences with their intense and often dramatic storytelling.

The Freeman continued: Eigenmann also commented about the “spontaneous love couple tattoo” between Philmar and the woman, whose identity was leaked by netizens with the photos of their identical body art.

Thus, the significance of the tattoo 224 grew in fame, symbolizing an enduring promise -"today, tomorrow, and forever.”

Could this phenomenon serve as a form of social catharsis, allowing individuals to momentarily escape the harsh realities of inflation, political instability, and the rising cost of basic commodities?

From a sociological perspective, such diversions function as coping mechanisms, providing collective emotional release and temporary relief from systemic stressors. Engaging in sensationalized narratives or entertainment fosters a sense of communal distraction, enabling people to navigate the burdens of socio-economic struggles while reinforcing shared cultural experiences.

Contemporary studies suggest that media consumption, particularly escapist content, helps people manage stress and cope with socio-economic hardships by offering a temporary sense of control and emotional regulation (Kubey & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).

Whether or not this serves as catharsis, individuals must develop self-awareness regarding their emotional entanglement with such situations. Cognitive appraisal theory suggests that people interpret and react to events based on personal beliefs and past experiences, which may explain why some reinforce the notion that "there is no forever" in relationships (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).

A strong sense of self-awareness and emotional regulation ultimately contributes to a more stable and adaptive personality.

Ultimately, Andi, Philmar, and the woman involved exist beyond our sphere of control. Their choices and actions shape their own realities, and whatever unfolds is a consequence of their personal decisions.

As observers, our role is not to dictate their paths but to recognize that navigating such situations lies solely in their hands.

The List is a Weapon

 

                                                    (photo: philstar.com)

Nahipakita man an listahan..

Dominique Nicole Flores of the Philippine Star reported on February 5, 2025: The House of Representatives impeached Vice President Sara Duterte on Wednesday, February 5, after at least one-third of its members endorsed the move. A total of 215 lawmakers backed the fourth impeachment complaint.

And the list of signatories was posted.

The event sparked a frenzy among netizens. Supporters of the impeachment celebrated triumphantly, while opponents vehemently declared that they would never forget what they saw as a betrayal by the representatives against the vice president.

Some hinted at their intention to retaliate in the May elections, vowing to cast their votes against those who supported the impeachment.

According to Marcus et al. (2019), emotions such as anger and betrayal drive political engagement, often motivating individuals to participate in elections as a form of protest or retribution. Similarly, a study by Dalton (2020) emphasizes that voters are more likely to penalize elected officials they perceive as disloyal to their political principles, leading to shifts in voter preferences.

Then, there were posts from those who supported the impeachment of the Vice President, which appeared to serve as justifications for their stance. Were these statements a response to the intense social media uproar? Did some begin to regret their decision in the face of public backlash? Or was this merely another tactic of self-preservation, a strategic attempt to control the narrative and deflect criticism?

Benoit (2018) posited that political actors employ image restoration strategies, such as denial, justification, and bolstering, to mitigate damage to their reputation in the face of criticism.

People tend to recognize politicians’ bravery and integrity when they remain steadfast in their decisions despite public scrutiny. If leaders voted *yes* on impeachment, they must demonstrate resilience and confidence in their judgment, making decisions based on wisdom and intelligence rather than succumbing to online criticism. In doing so, the public may perceive their choice as a reflection of genuine conviction, reinforcing their credibility and strengthening belief in their character.

Moreover, if they believed that their involvement in the impeachment process could tarnish the image they so carefully protect, they could have chosen to abstain altogether. However, if their participation was driven by a fear of losing favor with the current administration, they should have been prepared to face the inevitable consequences of their decision.

Political actors often navigate decision-making based on a careful balance between personal conviction and political survival. According to Mayhew (2019), legislators strategically align their actions with party expectations and public perception to maintain political capital. Similarly, Hirschman (2020) argues that fear of political retribution often compels officials to conform rather than abstain, even when a decision risks damaging their reputation.

These insights may imply that those who participated in the impeachment process could have done so not purely out of principle but out of concern for their political standing.

And since politics is a war, they must fortify themselves against the possibility of defeat. You see, the enemy on the other side is wielding *The List* as their weapon - one that could expose their opponents’ Achilles’ heel.