Pagkaon
da baja ta nan tilapia?
The Philippine Coast Guard launched a high-stakes dive operation in Taal
Lake on Friday, July 11, uncovering multiple sacks at the lakebed—potentially
linked to the grim fate of the missing sabungeros. Over 30 technical divers
were deployed after a site assessment, following the explosive revelations of
whistleblower Dondon "Patidongan." His testimony not only reignited
public interest but directly implicated gambling magnate Atong Ang in the
suspected murders of the cockfighting aficionados. This dramatic turn, reported
by Dominique Nicole Flores of The Philippine Star, signals a disturbing
convergence of crime, impunity, and political silence that demands national
reckoning.
As authorities comb through the depths
of Taal Lake based on the whistleblower Patidongan’s chilling disclosures, the
public’s reaction has taken a disquieting turn. Online, memes and parodies
warning against consuming lake-sourced produce such as tilapia and tawilis, have
gone viral, fueling panic and misinformation. Batangas Governor Vilma
Santos-Recto has raised the alarm over the growing concern, which has already
begun to impact the local economy. Fisherfolk in the coastal towns surrounding
Taal report a sharp decline in sales, as fear spreads that the lake, once a
vital source of livelihood, may now be tainted by its alleged use as a dumping ground
for murdered cockfighting enthusiasts.
Despite the absence of scientific
confirmation or official warnings, fear rooted in symbolic contamination has
triggered moral panic, resulting in declining fish sales and economic strain
for local fisherfolk. This reaction underscores how perception, shaped by
media, rumors, and cultural meanings, can override rational assessment and
affect real-world livelihoods (Flores, 2025; Cohen, 2002).
Considering that the alleged disposal of
bodies in Taal Lake occurred three years ago, why is there a sudden aversion to
consuming fish from its waters now? What explains this delayed but intense
public reaction? Is there a deeper psychological or sociological link between
the heinous nature of the crime and the collective avoidance behavior, or is
this merely a surface-level response amplified by sensationalism and viral
content?
Such questions invite a critical
reflection on how fear and symbolic contamination operate in society, often
independent of time or scientific evidence, yet powerful enough to reshape
perceptions and daily practices almost overnight.
This phenomenon can be understood
through the lens of Mary Douglas’s Purity and Danger (1966), which posits that
societies construct ideas of pollution and taboo not purely from physical risk
but from symbolic boundaries of order and morality. In the case of Taal Lake,
the association of the water with murder has rendered the lake's fish
symbolically "unclean," even though no direct evidence of
contamination exists. The public’s aversion reflects a cultural reaction to
perceived disorder, where the lake becomes a site of moral violation, and its
produce, by extension, becomes tainted.
After the COVID-19 outbreak was traced
to a wet market in Wuhan, China, wet markets in general, not just in Wuhan, were
symbolically marked as “unclean” or dangerous, even in places where there were
no cases or scientific links to infection. Many people avoided Asian markets
altogether, and in Western countries, this extended to anti-Asian xenophobia.
This reflects Douglas’s notion that symbolic contamination can override
objective assessments of risk.
During the height of the pandemic, many
avoided not only COVID-positive individuals but also their personal belongings,
homes, and even areas they had visited. This symbolic boundary of “unclean”
lingered beyond the actual infectious period, rooted in fear and a culturally
shaped understanding of purity.
Considering recent events in the
Philippines, where families of the missing cockfight aficionados continue to
cry out for justice, and communities around Taal Lake suffer from economic
decline due to the lake’s symbolic association with violence, the government
must respond with urgency and accountability. The area, now perceived as
“unclean,” reflects more than environmental fear; it reveals a deeper societal
wound inflicted by impunity and neglect. It is imperative that the state not
only ensures justice for the victims but also implements concrete measures to
prevent such heinous crimes in the future.
The lives of Filipino citizens must not
be treated as disposable or reduced to collateral damage in the pursuits of
greed and corruption. Restoring public trust requires more than recovery
operations: it demands systemic change, protection of human dignity, and a
reaffirmation that every life matters.
Justice must not sink with the silence of the
lake. If the state fails to act decisively, it not only abandons the missing, it
betrays the living.
No comments:
Post a Comment