When the Mind Becomes Critical

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Pusilon deretso?

Dominique Nicole Flores of the Philippine Star reported: One of the three victims in the Antipolo road rage altercation-turned-shooting died a day after the incident, city police chief Lieutenant Colonel Ryan Manongdo confirmed on Monday, March 31, 2025.

The road rage incident occurred around 5 p.m. on Sunday, March 30, of this year when 28-year-old suspect, known by the alias “Kenneth,” was seen in multiple videos circulating online pulling out a gun after a fistfight.

Netizens quickly directed their anger towards the riders involved, while others who were outraged by the shooting condemned the shooter for resorting to such extreme measures, especially given that he also wounded his own wife. However, some individuals shifted their perspective after seeing the earlier part of the video, which also went viral on social media, leading to a shift in public opinion.

This raises an important question: Why are some people so deeply invested in social media posts? Can their judgment be swayed by what they see without taking the time to fact-check? And if so, what are the potential consequences of adopting this kind of mindset?

Several studies have explored the impact of social media on judgment and decision-making. For instance, Fogg et al. (2003) highlighted how easily users are influenced by online content, often without verifying its accuracy. This phenomenon is further discussed by Pennycook and Rand (2018), who found that individuals are more likely to believe misinformation on social media if it aligns with their pre-existing beliefs, especially when fact-checking is not prioritized.

Are their judgments and opinions influenced by their ability to engage in critical thinking?

Critical thinking allows people to assess information more thoroughly, question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and consider alternative perspectives. When individuals lack strong critical thinking skills, they may be more susceptible to biases, emotional reactions, and misinformation, which can distort their judgment. On the other hand, those who actively apply critical thinking are more likely to make informed decisions and form well-reasoned opinions, as they are better equipped to filter out unreliable or misleading information.

Amid the challenges educators face in fostering critical thinking in the classroom, they are confronted with a significant threat: the social environment itself often lacks these skills. At home, where many parents treat their mobile phones as extensions of their lives, critical thinking may take a backseat. With constant exposure to quick, hasty judgments and misinformation online, parents may inadvertently model poor decision-making for their children. In such an environment, attempting to cultivate critical thinking skills in learners may feel like a futile effort, as the foundation for these skills is often absent at home.

Videos of road rage and other violent content will keep circulating, drawing in viewers who are constantly exposed to them. Over time, this endless stream of disturbing material can numb people, making them less sensitive to the impact of what they’re seeing. Instead of sparking thoughtful reflection, these videos can desensitize audiences, normalizing harmful behavior and dulling their ability to critically engage with the world around them.

Crimes Amongst the Young

 

                                                (image: youtube.com)

Magkamatay na dajon…

Inquirer.net reported on March 28, 2025: A grade 8 male student fatally stabbed his classmate with a kitchen knife after an argument at a high school in Parañaque City.

In a DWLA radio interview, Parañaque City assistant police chief Lt. Col. Eric Angustia said the incident arose from a disagreement between the 15-year-old suspect and the 14-year-old victim. It started when the suspect borrowed make-up from the victim without her permission. That’s why they argued.

In a statement also on Thursday, the Moonwalk National High School said it was cooperating with authorities in its investigation, adding that the incident was an “isolated” case.

These news stories often leave readers and the public in a state of disbelief, as it's almost impossible to comprehend the depth of hatred that young people can harbor so intense that it leads them to take another person's life.

If this behavior stems from bullying, what might be the underlying environment of these young individuals at home? Are they subjected to domestic violence to such an extent that its impact spills over into their school lives, influencing their actions in the classroom?

Studies suggest that children who witness or experience household violence may internalize harmful behaviors, which can escalate into bullying or even violent acts toward others (Evans, Davies, & DiLillo, 2008). This exposure not only disrupts their emotional development but also affects their ability to regulate anger and form healthy relationships, leading to destructive patterns that extend beyond the home (Jaffe, Wolfe, & Wilson, 1990).

Violence is prevalent across virtually all social media platforms, and its pervasive nature can have a cascading effect on individuals exposed to this content. Many so-called "content creators" have even started to view violence as a tool for engagement, often prioritizing sensationalized or harmful content to attract attention. As a result, these disturbing portrayals not only thrive but continue to fuel a cycle of negativity and aggression online, influencing the behavior and mindset of viewers.

The mind should remain free from the corruption of violence. Parents have a crucial role in nurturing love, care, and empathy, and they must serve as the primary protectors of their children, safeguarding them from harmful media content that promotes violence. As the first line of defense, parents must actively monitor and guide their children's exposure, fostering a healthy environment that shields them from the damaging effects of violent portrayals in the media.

By-Products of What?

 

                                             (image: youtube.com, abs-cbn news)

Sa una mga bomba films man adto…

Janvic Mateo of the Philippine Star reported on March 22, 2025: Vloggers Krizette Laureta Chu, who claimed being an editor of a big newspaper, Mary Jane Quiambao Reyes and Mark Lopez were subjected to thorough scrutiny by lawmakers investigating the spread of fake news and misinformation through social media.

The house probe was initiated in response to the widespread dissemination of fake news across social media platforms, allegedly propagated by vloggers who are said to have political affiliations with a prominent figure. These individuals are accused of spreading misinformation with the primary intent of sowing discord, confusion, and distortion of facts, which could ultimately contribute to the corruption of public perception and the manipulation of public opinion.

Some have expressed concerns that these investigations could result in the suppression of free speech and the infringement of individuals' right to express their opinions.

During the Martial Law years in the Philippines, “bomba” movies emerged as a form of both release and rebellion, offering a means of expression amidst the suppression of basic freedoms. Scholars argue that these films, characterized by their bold sexual content and subversive themes, served as a cultural outlet for the Filipino people, allowing them to silently resist the political oppression of the time (Bautista, 2001; Quindoza-Santiago, 1998).

Despite being heavily censored, bomba films provided a space for individuals to confront and process the socio-political climate, often using suggestive narratives to critique the authoritarian regime (Sison, 2003).

In this way, bomba cinema became a powerful tool of resistance, reflecting the frustrations of a society under strict control and offering a subtle yet potent form of protest against the stifling of free expression.

Lino Brocka, along with other filmmakers, was imprisoned during Martial Law in the Philippines primarily due to his outspoken political views and his films' social critiques. He was a vocal critic of the government's human rights abuses, censorship, and the suppression of freedom of expression.

In an era where the internet connects us all, can we view the rise of fake news, memes and unfounded weblogs as a symptom of underlying societal unease? From a Social Science perspective, these phenomena may stem from a variety of factors, including widespread distrust in traditional media, political polarization, and the increasing fragmentation of information sources.

The spread of misinformation is driven by echo chambers, where people only see content that matches what they already believe, making divisions and confusion worse.

An affluent individual once subtly remarked to this writer, *“I keep quiet about social issues to avoid getting caught up in the mess.” This statement raised a red flag, as it starkly contradicted the deeply held belief that we live in a democracy where expressing our opinions is not only a fundamental right but a responsibility.

Of course, spreading lies and false information is undeniably wrong, but attempting to silence or coerce others into withholding their ideas and opinions is a byproduct of an oppressive and controlling mindset. Such actions undermine the very principles of free expression and foster an environment of fear and conformity.

It is the responsibility of the House of Representatives to initiate actions in aid of legislation, but the House must exercise great caution in navigating the fine line between serving the greater good and pursuing personal interests. Their actions should always prioritize the welfare of the public, ensuring that decisions are made with integrity and accountability, rather than being driven by ulterior motives.

Vloggers and bloggers must recognize the responsibility that comes with expressing their ideas. It’s not enough to simply share what they feel; they must also consider what is ethically and factually right. Before voicing their opinions to the vast audience of the internet, they should be mindful of the laws of the land and the application of universal values, ensuring their content is not only truthful but respectful of the broader societal impact.

In fact, the word fake news is an oxymoron. The combination of these two words creates a contradiction, as true news should be based on factual accuracy, while "fake" inherently undermines that truth.

InTact

 

                                                  (image: youtube.com)

Jaon lagi usahay masobrahan an mga sulti…

Cebu Daily News reported on March 13, 2025: The online frenzy over former President Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest by the International Criminal Court (ICC) intensified when political scientist and media personality Richard Heydarian compared Mindanao to Sub-Saharan Africa.

This sparked an outpouring of criticism from netizens in the Mindanao area, who wasted no time in lambasting the media personality. The backlash quickly escalated, with memes and other humorous content flooding online platforms, mocking the seemingly degrading "analysis" put forth by the figure in question.

Heydarian later shared another video clarifying that his previous remarks had been misunderstood. He explained that he made the comparisons in order to help the international community grasp the context, as terms like *barangays* and *sitios* might not be familiar to a global audience. He emphasized that his intent was to provide a clearer perspective for those outside the Philippines to understand the complexities of the situation.

But what is really the Sub-Saharan Region?

Sub-Saharan Africa refers to the region of Africa located south of the Sahara Desert, encompassing a diverse range of countries, cultures, and ecosystems. It is characterized by a complex interplay of geographic, economic, and social factors. The region includes various climates, from tropical rainforests to arid deserts, and has some of the world's most biodiverse areas.

Economically, Sub-Saharan Africa faces numerous challenges, including high poverty rates, limited access to education, and political instability (Moyo, 2009).

Upon reviewing the description, it seems that the analyst’s comparison could have some merit. However, one might wonder: what triggered such a strong reaction from the people of Mindanao?

This writer's reflection focuses on the untimeliness of Heydarian's comments, made when the people of Mindanao were still reeling from the shock and pain of recent events involving their revered leader. His remarks appeared to deepen the wound, adding insult to injury at a time when sensitivity and empathy were most needed.

The personality became TACTLESS. Tact involves understanding the appropriate choice of words and timing, ensuring that communication is sensitive, considerate, and respectful of the situation or the audience. It’s about being diplomatic and using discretion when expressing thoughts or opinions, particularly in delicate or challenging situations.

While it’s true that we have the right to express our opinions and ideas in a democracy, exercising this freedom requires a thoughtful balance between honesty and sensitivity. Applying tact means communicating our views in a way that respects others' perspectives and emotions, ensuring that our words are both truthful and considerate, especially in delicate situations.

Does he deserve the online backlash? This is a reality that all vloggers and bloggers must acknowledge. While the freedom to share content on the internet is a right, it also comes with the understanding that others are equally free to express their opinions—whether positive or negative. When you post for a global audience, you must expect that people will react openly, sharing their thoughts and critiques just as freely as you share your own.

This is why journalism should be studied thoroughly, or at the very least, understood before one takes on the role of an online personality. Concepts like libel, plagiarism, proper writing techniques, syntax, tact, coherence, and the principles of crafting newsworthy stories must be fully grasped in order to apply them effectively.

Otherwise, gobbledygook takes place.

Blurred Lines and Societal Implications

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Vlogger na ta tanan.

The appeal of META's monetization options for videos and posts has led many to consider vlogging as a serious pursuit. This shift includes educators who have now adopted the role of "influencers," spending considerable time shooting, editing, and posting their videos on platforms like Facebook.

Filipinos have a strong tradition of sharing stories with friends and family, a cultural phenomenon that extends beyond borders. We view ourselves as deeply interconnected, which is why we enjoy sharing the details of our daily lives, not only with fellow Filipinos but also with foreigners.

Several studies have examined the cultural significance of sharing stories and maintaining interconnectedness among Filipinos. Nolasco (2012) explores how Filipinos use social media to express and share their identities, highlighting the importance of online self-representation. Bautista (2004) discusses the Filipino value of social connectedness and its impact on communication practices, emphasizing the sharing of personal stories.

Teachers and other educators are also engaging in this practice, with some noting that it serves as a way to alleviate stress.

But what happens when vlogging blurs the line between educating the young and becoming overly consumed by the process, causing individuals to lose sight of their primary key responsibility?

This led the Schools Division of Zamboanga del Sur to issue DM 124, s. 2025 on March 5 of this year, titled "Adherence to Professional Conduct in Classrooms – Prohibition of Video Recording and Vlogging During Class/Office Hours." The memorandum emphasizes the importance of ensuring that learners are not included in any vlogs, recordings, or social media content related to personal activities. It also underscores the need to prioritize the structured and uninterrupted delivery of lessons.

Sison (2020) emphasizes the potential risks of involving students in online content, noting the need for safeguards to protect privacy and ensure focus on educational objectives. Additionally, the work of Cruz and Tan (2017) suggests that teachers' use of social media for personal purposes during class hours can distract from their professional duties, which may impact their effectiveness in the classroom.

Looking at the wider scope: Can vlogging be considered a "blue ocean" for us, offering new opportunities in a time when inflation looms daily, threatening the stability of our future? Who can blame people for turning to this appealing and accessible opportunity when even basic needs, like health insurance, are not a government priority?

Sociologists believe that people's actions are often driven by specific stimuli. The growing mass interest in vlogging may be a response to the challenges of the times, with the activity serving as both an escape and a potential opportunity to access better resources or improve one’s circumstances.

According to Pineda and Santos (2019), individuals often turn to digital content creation as a means of coping with economic uncertainty, viewing it as a way to generate income and gain social recognition. Similarly, research by Dela Cruz (2020) suggests that vlogging has become a form of escapism for many, offering a creative outlet amid personal or societal difficulties.

Legislators must carefully consider these studies and emerging phenomena to craft more effective laws that can improve the lives of Filipinos and mitigate the effects of inflation. Attention must also be given to the well-being of the disadvantaged, including teachers, to ensure that the educational system is strengthened and can better serve the needs of the nation.

Yet, some legislators remain skeptical of research. One even said: Baliw na baliw kayo sa research. Aanhin niyo ba yung research?

Political Embrace

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Hain da jaon tagalong na mag serbisyo…

Delon Porcalla of The Philippine Star reported on January 6, 2025: Three government agencies are now in the process of fine-tuning an efficient system where beneficiaries of the government’s Ayuda Para sa Kapos ang Kita (AKAP) Program will be totally free from the influence of either national or local politics.

This is the “move” of the government to insulate AKAP from politicians according to Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), the lead agency for the distribution of the financial aid to the near poor; Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA).

Critics label AKAP, TUPAD (Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers) and AICS (Assistance to Individuals in Crisis Situation) as "dole-outs" when they believe the programs create dependency rather than empowering people to earn sustainable incomes.

There’s also concern that some politicians use these programs for "patronage politics" -giving aid selectively to gain loyalty or votes, rather than based on real need.

Patronage politics refers to a system where political leaders distribute resources, jobs, or favors to supporters in exchange for political loyalty. This practice often involves appointing individuals to government positions based on their allegiance rather than merit, aiming to consolidate power and maintain control. It's a prevalent feature in various political systems, influencing governance and public administration.

Studies have examined the dynamics and implications of patronage politics. For instance, Grzymala-Busse (2008) discusses how political parties utilize state resources for patronage, affecting democratic accountability and state functioning. Similarly, Kopecký et al. (2012) analyze party patronage in democracies, highlighting its impact on political competition and public trust.

This reflects self-serving tactics that prioritize personal gain over the collective good, gradually undermining the quality of government services. Once deeply embedded in the system, it risks shaping a dangerous precedent, leading future generations to perceive such practices as the accepted norm.

Studies have shown that patronage politics in the Philippines often leads to self-serving practices that undermine the quality of government services. Hutchcroft (2012) notes that local politicians prioritize distributing patronage resources to their constituents over delivering essential public goods, resulting in uneven service provision across regions.

When self-serving practices overshadow genuine public service, the very foundation of democracy is weakened, fostering a culture where political loyalty is rewarded over competence and merit. If left unchallenged, this cycle of favoritism and corruption risks becoming ingrained as a societal norm, perpetuating inequality and diminishing the people's trust in their leaders.

A relentless cycle of instability and poverty will inevitably unfold.

Being Stoic

 

                                                    (image: youtube.com)

Di ibutang sa boot…

The world is in a perpetual state of outrage. With every passing second, a cascade of events unfolds at the tip of our fingertips. This relentless stream of information provokes emotional responses, and without vigilance, one’s mental well-being can easily be compromised.

According to Smith et al. (2023), the pervasive nature of online content accelerates emotional contagion, where unchecked reactions spread quickly across social networks. This unrelenting influx of stimuli, if met without emotional regulation, can significantly impact mental well-being.

Jones and Taylor (2022) highlight that the brain's constant engagement with distressing content heightens anxiety levels, reinforcing a cycle of stress and reactivity.

The principles of Stoicism emphasize detaching oneself from emotional entanglements. By disregarding what lies beyond one’s control and focusing solely on what can be governed, individuals cultivate inner stability. This shift in perspective reduces psychological turmoil, allowing the mind to navigate life’s uncertainties with greater clarity and resilience.

Stoicism is an ancient philosophical school founded by Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century BCE, emphasizing self-control, rational thinking, and the pursuit of virtue as the highest good (Sellars, 2018). At its core, Stoicism teaches that individuals should focus on what lies within their control—such as their thoughts, actions, and responses—while accepting external events with equanimity, as they are beyond one's influence (Williamson, 2020).

This philosophy promotes emotional resilience by advocating for detachment from destructive emotions and fostering inner peace through reason and discipline (Robertson, 2019). By mastering their internal world, Stoics believe that people can achieve tranquility and moral integrity, regardless of life’s adversities.

Marcus Aurelius, Seneca, and other Stoic philosophers assert that by practicing Stoicism, one can cultivate inner peace by preventing emotions such as envy, anger, and the countless feelings we experience daily from overpowering reason. Through disciplined thought and mindful detachment, they believed that true tranquility arises not from the absence of emotion but from mastering one’s responses to it.

By adopting a Stoic mindset, people can cultivate emotional resilience, reduce anxiety, and respond to life’s uncertainties with clarity and composure. In a world brimming with noise and outrage, Stoicism serves as a powerful tool for achieving balance and maintaining psychological well-being.

Books like The Daily Stoic by Ryan Holiday and Stephen Hanselman, How to Think Like a Roman Emperor by Donald Robertson, and Stoicism and the Art of Happiness by Donald J. Robertson have become bestsellers, reflecting a growing interest in applying Stoic principles to modern life. This resurgence highlights how people seek timeless wisdom to navigate the complexities of today’s turbulent world—managing stress, fostering emotional resilience, and finding clarity amidst chaos.

The pursuit of a peaceful life rests within each individual’s grasp. As Marcus Aurelius once said, 'You have power over your mind—not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.' By choosing to focus on what truly matters and releasing unnecessary emotional burdens, we create space for more meaningful moments.

In mastering this balance, we lessen the weight of turmoil and embrace a life of clarity, purpose, and inner calm.

Cupid's Prey

 

                                                 (photo: youtube.com) 

Kahapon da nagkapuliki na pwede man sab kuman…

As of January 2025, the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) warned of a potential rise in "love scams" as Valentine's Day approaches. These scams, according to dzrh.com.ph, often involve perpetrators deceiving individuals into romantic relationships to extract money or personal information.

But why do people so easily fall victim to these scams? Is it the relentless societal pressure to celebrate Valentine's Day with a romantic partner? Could it be the overwhelming influence of commercialism, with businesses aggressively marketing flowers, cakes, and extravagant dining experiences to drive consumer spending? Or perhaps, is it simply that many individuals invest too much emotion in occasions like this, making them more susceptible to deception?

A 2024 survey by the Social Weather Stations (SWS) revealed that 58% of Filipinos described their love life as "very happy," indicating a deep emotional engagement with romantic relationships during this period (GMA News Online, 2024).

This emotional investment is further reflected in consumer behavior; for instance, a 2025 report highlighted that Filipinos are increasingly opting for personalized and experiential gifts over traditional items, suggesting a desire to create meaningful connections through their Valentine's Day celebrations (P&A Grant Thornton, 2025).

However, this heightened focus on the holiday can sometimes lead to financial strain, as individuals may feel pressured to spend beyond their means to express affection, underscoring the complex interplay between emotional desires and economic realities in the context of Valentine's Day.

Filipinos tend to place great importance on celebrations like Valentine's Day due to deeply ingrained cultural values that emphasize love, relationships, and social connection. This focus stems from a collectivist society where relationships - whether romantic, familial, or platonic—are central to one's identity and emotional well-being. Additionally, media and commercial influences amplify the significance of these events, shaping societal expectations around grand romantic gestures and gift-giving.

In the past, only the affluent had the privilege of receiving bouquets of flowers. However, with the growing influence of social media, the practice has become more widespread and normalized. Today, even men are receiving floral arrangements - an act that was once considered unconventional way back then.

These trends also persist due to the pervasive fear of missing out (FOMO), as individuals feel pressured to participate in celebrations simply to stay socially relevant. The desire to have an ideal online presence drives many to engage in these events - after all, what would they post on their social media accounts without photos that align with the occasion?

While expressions of love and affection are natural, allowing emotions to dictate one’s actionsespecially in materialistic or socially constructed celebrations - can lead to unnecessary strain. Stoic philosophy teaches that reason must govern emotions, ensuring that one's happiness is not dependent on external validation or fleeting moments.

By practicing temperance and focusing on what is within our control, we can appreciate these occasions without being consumed by societal expectations or emotional excess.

224

 

                                                  (photo: pep.ph)

Apektado kay bas mahaod sa ila?

Cebu’s The Freeman reported on February 9, 2025: Andi Eigenmann, who has been based in Siargao with Philmar Alipayo and their kids, revealed the reason why she posted the series of cryptic Instagram stories early Saturday morning. She added details to their relationship and how the unidentified woman, whom she called “friend,” affected it.

The news quickly spread like wildfire across social media, seemingly overshadowing discussions on Vice President Duterte’s impeachment. This, in turn, sparked reflection like: Are Filipinos so deeply driven by emotions that events like these become sensational phenomena, consuming their attention?

Filipinos' fascination with celebrity breakups can be attributed to their strong sense of emotional investment in public figures, a culture deeply rooted in collectivism and interpersonal relationships (Joaquin & Biana, 2021). Social media amplifies this engagement, creating a shared emotional experience that fosters discussions, speculations, and even moral judgments (Tandoc & Vos, 2016).

Even as far back as the 1980s, the themes of movies and television dramas—fondly referred to as “telenovelas”- have often revolved around breakups, infidelity, and the profound consequences of being "the other woman." These narratives frequently highlight the emotional turmoil, moral dilemmas, and societal repercussions of extramarital affairs, reinforcing traditional values while captivating audiences with their intense and often dramatic storytelling.

The Freeman continued: Eigenmann also commented about the “spontaneous love couple tattoo” between Philmar and the woman, whose identity was leaked by netizens with the photos of their identical body art.

Thus, the significance of the tattoo 224 grew in fame, symbolizing an enduring promise -"today, tomorrow, and forever.”

Could this phenomenon serve as a form of social catharsis, allowing individuals to momentarily escape the harsh realities of inflation, political instability, and the rising cost of basic commodities?

From a sociological perspective, such diversions function as coping mechanisms, providing collective emotional release and temporary relief from systemic stressors. Engaging in sensationalized narratives or entertainment fosters a sense of communal distraction, enabling people to navigate the burdens of socio-economic struggles while reinforcing shared cultural experiences.

Contemporary studies suggest that media consumption, particularly escapist content, helps people manage stress and cope with socio-economic hardships by offering a temporary sense of control and emotional regulation (Kubey & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).

Whether or not this serves as catharsis, individuals must develop self-awareness regarding their emotional entanglement with such situations. Cognitive appraisal theory suggests that people interpret and react to events based on personal beliefs and past experiences, which may explain why some reinforce the notion that "there is no forever" in relationships (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).

A strong sense of self-awareness and emotional regulation ultimately contributes to a more stable and adaptive personality.

Ultimately, Andi, Philmar, and the woman involved exist beyond our sphere of control. Their choices and actions shape their own realities, and whatever unfolds is a consequence of their personal decisions.

As observers, our role is not to dictate their paths but to recognize that navigating such situations lies solely in their hands.

The List is a Weapon

 

                                                    (photo: philstar.com)

Nahipakita man an listahan..

Dominique Nicole Flores of the Philippine Star reported on February 5, 2025: The House of Representatives impeached Vice President Sara Duterte on Wednesday, February 5, after at least one-third of its members endorsed the move. A total of 215 lawmakers backed the fourth impeachment complaint.

And the list of signatories was posted.

The event sparked a frenzy among netizens. Supporters of the impeachment celebrated triumphantly, while opponents vehemently declared that they would never forget what they saw as a betrayal by the representatives against the vice president.

Some hinted at their intention to retaliate in the May elections, vowing to cast their votes against those who supported the impeachment.

According to Marcus et al. (2019), emotions such as anger and betrayal drive political engagement, often motivating individuals to participate in elections as a form of protest or retribution. Similarly, a study by Dalton (2020) emphasizes that voters are more likely to penalize elected officials they perceive as disloyal to their political principles, leading to shifts in voter preferences.

Then, there were posts from those who supported the impeachment of the Vice President, which appeared to serve as justifications for their stance. Were these statements a response to the intense social media uproar? Did some begin to regret their decision in the face of public backlash? Or was this merely another tactic of self-preservation, a strategic attempt to control the narrative and deflect criticism?

Benoit (2018) posited that political actors employ image restoration strategies, such as denial, justification, and bolstering, to mitigate damage to their reputation in the face of criticism.

People tend to recognize politicians’ bravery and integrity when they remain steadfast in their decisions despite public scrutiny. If leaders voted *yes* on impeachment, they must demonstrate resilience and confidence in their judgment, making decisions based on wisdom and intelligence rather than succumbing to online criticism. In doing so, the public may perceive their choice as a reflection of genuine conviction, reinforcing their credibility and strengthening belief in their character.

Moreover, if they believed that their involvement in the impeachment process could tarnish the image they so carefully protect, they could have chosen to abstain altogether. However, if their participation was driven by a fear of losing favor with the current administration, they should have been prepared to face the inevitable consequences of their decision.

Political actors often navigate decision-making based on a careful balance between personal conviction and political survival. According to Mayhew (2019), legislators strategically align their actions with party expectations and public perception to maintain political capital. Similarly, Hirschman (2020) argues that fear of political retribution often compels officials to conform rather than abstain, even when a decision risks damaging their reputation.

These insights may imply that those who participated in the impeachment process could have done so not purely out of principle but out of concern for their political standing.

And since politics is a war, they must fortify themselves against the possibility of defeat. You see, the enemy on the other side is wielding *The List* as their weapon - one that could expose their opponents’ Achilles’ heel.

Contagion

 

                                                 (image: youtube.com)

Makatapon an kabuang?

With the growing prevalence of mental health issues and actions highlighted across social media platforms, one might wonder: Can psychological disorders be contagious?

Actually, psychological disorders are not contagious in the traditional sense, but they can significantly affect those around the individual through emotional strain, behavioral influence, and interpersonal conflict.

People struggling with psychological disturbances can be found everywhere—within homes, workplaces, and even in the virtual world, where they often express their distorted actions, behaviors, and opinions without restraint. As these expressions intensify, they can overwhelm those around them, leading to emotional strain, heightened anxiety, and even depression.

Research indicates that unfavorable social environments contribute to increased vulnerability to mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression (Patel et al., 2023). For instance, social media interactions can heighten feelings of anxiety and depression, particularly among adolescents and young adults (UC Davis Health, 2024).

Narcissistic people often manipulate others, prioritize self-interest, and create divisive dynamics, resulting in emotional exhaustion and dissatisfaction (Karakitapoğlu-Aygün et al., 2023).

Avoiding such individuals is challenging, as they are often present in various aspects of daily life. More troubling is their inability to recognize their own psychological disturbances, leading them to rationalize their harmful behaviors, even when they have caused significant emotional distress to others. Yet, they persist, deriving a sense of gratification from their actions—an attempt to compensate for their deep-seated emotional voids, as if inflicting pain or asserting dominance could somehow fill their internal deficiencies.

Lately, we have witnessed individuals attempting to disrupt our peace, resorting to intimidation by threatening to padlock establishments while demanding compliance with their fabricated sense of authority.

How do we fortify our navigational capacities with these people around?

Surviving in environments with individuals exhibiting psychological disturbances requires a combination of emotional resilience, strategic boundary-setting, and mindful stress management. Developing self-awareness and emotional detachment helps prevent internalizing toxic behaviors, while assertive communication and firm boundaries ensure protection from manipulation.

Navigating social dynamics effectively involves selective engagement, seeking support networks, and understanding institutional policies to mitigate negative impacts. Additionally, practicing mindfulness techniques, engaging in stress-relieving activities, and knowing when to seek intervention can safeguard mental well-being.

If we allow them to influence us, what remains of our sanity?

Her Majesty

 

                                              (image: youtube.com)

Sijay tag-ija nan tanan hasta Rayna baja sija?

Recently, Bae Lourdes Infante, the self-proclaimed woman-leader of the Federal Tribal Government of the Philippines (FTGP) in Surigao City, took to Facebook Live to vocally accuse various politicians, including the President, of being complicit in actions against her group's interests. In her broadcast, she alleged that these officials were undermining the FTGP's claims to ancestral lands and disregarding their rights.

Major corporations such as Meta, Jollibee, and McDonald's were also called out by Infante, urging them to recognize and support her group's claims, as she and her followers assert themselves as the rightful owners of all things. She further proclaimed her ability to command the elements—water, fire, and earth—to align with their cause, declaring themselves the true Engcatadia and Engcantado.

While many dismissed these incoherent social media outbursts with laughter, psychologists are probably reacting with concern, recognizing troubling signs of delusions of grandeur and their potential implications.

Delusions of grandeur are a type of false belief in which individuals perceive themselves as possessing extraordinary abilities, wealth, power, or influence, often disconnected from reality. These delusions are commonly associated with psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and delusional disorder (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022).

Individuals experiencing grandiose delusions may believe they have supernatural powers, a divine mission, or unique relationships with influential figures (Coltheart, Menzies, & Sutton, 2021).

These false beliefs of exceptional power or influence may also arise from personality disorders, social isolation, or cultural influences (Freeman, 2018). In some cases, excessive dopamine activity, often triggered by stimulants or medication, can contribute to grandiose thinking (Weintraub et al., 2006).

Disturbing events once again unfolded on Facebook Live when one of their members, referred to as a "diplomat," was arrested for illegal possession of a deadly weapon. In a fit of rage, Infante erupted into a furious tirade, ominously declaring that a bloodbath would soon engulf Surigao City.

Delusions of grandeur and threats of violence are red flags for deeper psychological issues, such as a psychotic disorder, especially when accompanied by impaired reality testing. These manifestations can pose serious risks not only to the individual experiencing them but also to those around them, as the inability to distinguish between reality and delusion may lead to harmful actions or unpredictable behavior.

Meanwhile, Alexander Lopez of balita.com reported on January 27, 2025: Indigenous Peoples (IP) leaders in the Caraga region have condemned the activities of the Federal Tribal Government of the Philippines (FTGP), an organization labeled as illegitimate by the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples in Caraga (NCIP-13).

But, whether legitimate or not, the alarming rants of this self-proclaimed goddess should be addressed, as her violent outbursts have the potential to deeply impact the emotions and mental well-being of young people who have access to her page. It is important to consider the concept that mental health issues can be contagious, as exposure to such distressing content can escalate feelings of anxiety, fear, or even lead to imitation of harmful behaviors.

(Extro music: Mad World by Tears for Fears)

God-sent

 

                            (photo: Surigao News Update)

Tag istorya sila nan Ginoo?

Recent reports indicate that Hon. Jorgeto Corpus Santisas, also known as "Datu Adlaw" of the Federal Tribal Government of the Philippines, has been involved in padlocking certain establishments in Surigao City. In the Facebook page of RPN DXKS Surigao, a video titled "Datu Adlaw Leader sa Pag Padlock ng Absolute ug Eduhome Surigao City" is posted, which includes an interview with the Chief of Police of Surigao City.

The leader of the group adamantly declared that their actions represent God's divine will to reclaim the land. But what compels individuals to believe that they are the direct recipients of God's voice and mandate?

The phenomenon where individuals believe that God is directly communicating with them can be understood through various lenses, including psychological, spiritual, and sociocultural perspectives.

Psychologically, such experiences may be classified as auditory hallucinations, often associated with mental health conditions like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, where individuals report hearing voices or receiving messages they attribute to divine sources (Waters et al., 2012).

In religious or spiritual contexts, these experiences are frequently framed as divine revelations, wherein individuals believe they are chosen to receive sacred guidance or carry out a divine mission (Luhrmann, 2012).

In extreme cases, this belief may manifest as a messianic complex, characterized by a conviction of having a unique, God-given role. The interpretation of these experiences varies widely across cultures and traditions, highlighting the interplay between psychological predispositions and sociocultural influences (Stark, 2017).

Charismatic leadership often resonates during times of uncertainty or crisis, so, loyal followers are drawn to leaders who provide clear and simple answers.

When individuals claiming divine communication intrude on the rights of others, it raises significant legal, ethical, and social concerns. Such actions often blur the line between personal belief and harmful behavior, necessitating societal intervention.

The harm principle articulated by philosopher John Stuart Mill argues that individuals are free to act according to their beliefs as long as they do not harm others (Mill, 1859). When religious or spiritual claims lead to harm, governments are obligated to enforce legal measures to protect public safety and uphold individual rights.

When a group of individuals is forcibly confined by padlocking their rented space, it constitutes a clear violation of their fundamental rights and personal freedoms.

Datu Adlaw must be firmly reminded that God's will does not condone the oppression of His people, as true divine guidance promotes justice, and compassion.

If he persist with neglecting others’ rights, his light must be concealed behind bars or the cuckoo’s nest.

Cheesy

 

                                              (image: youtube.com)

An principal kibali mag lesson plan sab, sija day sab mag tsek ija plano?

The Manila Bulletin reported on January 14, 2025: During a hearing on Jan. 7 of this year, [it is] noted that according to Escudero, while the teacher-to-student ratio in the Department of Education (DepEd) “appears favorable on paper, it falls short in practice, as many teaching positions, including those held by principals, no longer involve direct classroom instruction.”

In a conversation with a Department of Budget and Management (DBM) official, Escudero noted that “all principals hold teaching positions, but about 90 percent of principals don’t actually teach anymore.”

The three principal organizations, the Philippine Elementary Principals Association (PESPA), the National Association of Public Secondary School Heads, Inc. (NAPSSHI), and the National Association of Public Secondary Schools of the Philippines (NAPSSPHIL), urged Escudero to “take a closer look” at the job descriptions, functions, and Key Result Areas (KRAs) of principals.

Could the senator be misinformed about the designation of principals as non-teaching personnel within DepEd? Or is he specifically referring to school heads who serve as Teachers-in-Charge (TICs), a role that combines administrative responsibilities with teaching duties?

Social media erupted with criticism and ridicule directed at the senator's statement, with many principals expressing their frustration and disbelief. Some even challenged the senator to immerse himself in the role of a school principal for one week and then compose a position paper on whether it remains feasible for these educational leaders to juggle both teaching and administrative responsibilities effectively.

Elected officials have a critical responsibility to communicate accurately and base their statements on verified facts, as their words influence public opinion and policy-making. Effective communication grounded in factual information enhances trust and ensures that decisions align with the public's best interests (Kavanagh & Rich, 2018).

When officials disseminate misinformation, it can lead to confusion, erode public confidence, and hinder effective governance (Lewandowsky et al., 2017). For instance, debates surrounding the designation of school principals as non-teaching personnel underscore the importance of accurate terminology and context in addressing systemic educational issues.

DepEd Order No. 19, s. 1998 outlines the criteria for school leadership roles, allowing a Head Teacher to serve as a school head in institutions with at least six teaching personnel, overseeing both administrative and instructional functions. In smaller schools with fewer than six teachers, leadership responsibilities may be handled by either a Head Teacher or a designated Teacher-in-Charge (TIC), depending on staffing and administrative requirements.

If this is what the senator is referring to, he must clarify his statement, as it could create confusion among full-fledged principals regarding their roles, particularly in providing technical assistance to teachers. The ambiguity may undermine their ability to effectively carry out instructional supervision and ensure its thorough implementation.

Clear communication is essential to avoid misinterpretations that could hinder the quality of educational leadership and support for teaching staff.

Otherwise, if principals are compelled to take on teaching duties, rather than focusing on reviewing teachers' lesson plans to enhance the teaching and learning process, they might find themselves diverted to tasks such as designing visual aids.