Tag istorya sila nan Ginoo?
Recent reports indicate that Hon. Jorgeto Corpus
Santisas, also known as "Datu Adlaw" of the Federal Tribal Government
of the Philippines, has been involved in padlocking certain establishments in
Surigao City. In the Facebook page of RPN DXKS Surigao, a video titled
"Datu Adlaw Leader sa Pag Padlock ng Absolute ug Eduhome Surigao
City" is posted, which includes an interview with the Chief of Police of
Surigao City.
The leader of the group adamantly declared that
their actions represent God's divine will to reclaim the land. But what compels
individuals to believe that they are the direct recipients of God's voice and
mandate?
The phenomenon where individuals believe that God
is directly communicating with them can be understood through various lenses,
including psychological, spiritual, and sociocultural perspectives.
Psychologically, such experiences may be classified
as auditory hallucinations, often associated with mental health conditions like
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, where individuals report hearing voices or
receiving messages they attribute to divine sources (Waters et al., 2012).
In religious or spiritual contexts, these
experiences are frequently framed as divine revelations, wherein individuals
believe they are chosen to receive sacred guidance or carry out a divine
mission (Luhrmann, 2012).
In extreme cases, this belief may manifest as a
messianic complex, characterized by a conviction of having a unique, God-given
role. The interpretation of these experiences varies widely across cultures and
traditions, highlighting the interplay between psychological predispositions
and sociocultural influences (Stark, 2017).
Charismatic leadership often resonates during times
of uncertainty or crisis, so, loyal followers are drawn to leaders who provide
clear and simple answers.
When individuals claiming divine communication
intrude on the rights of others, it raises significant legal, ethical, and
social concerns. Such actions often blur the line between personal belief and
harmful behavior, necessitating societal intervention.
The harm principle articulated by philosopher John
Stuart Mill argues that individuals are free to act according to their beliefs
as long as they do not harm others (Mill, 1859). When religious or spiritual
claims lead to harm, governments are obligated to enforce legal measures to
protect public safety and uphold individual rights.
When a group of individuals is forcibly confined by
padlocking their rented space, it constitutes a clear violation of their
fundamental rights and personal freedoms.
Datu Adlaw must be firmly reminded that God's will
does not condone the oppression of His people, as true divine guidance promotes
justice, and compassion.
If he persist with neglecting others’ rights, his
light must be concealed behind bars or the cuckoo’s nest.
No comments:
Post a Comment