Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Excuse me, Sir!

 

                                               (image: youtube.com)

Di siguro kun sir…Yots!

Claudine Flores of Sunstar reported on July 22, 2024: A “MISGENDERING” incident made rounds on social media after a customer, a member of the LGBTQ community, made a male restaurant wait staff adopt a “parade rest” stance for almost two hours for addressing him as “sir.” The customer was identified by a netizen as the local Cebu personality Jude Bacalso, a writer, former TV personality and host in Cebu.

People went berserk on social media sites as they bash the culprit for his inhumane treatment to the waiter.

Bacalso said that “she” is just educating the person who misgendered her on the issue of gender issues and equality. Yet, even members of the LGBTQ community raised their voices in protest for a seemingly punitive action given to the food server.

He seemed to weaponize his advocacy.

Weaponizing an advocacy involves manipulating a cause or movement to serve ulterior motives, often at the expense of the original intention. This process can distort the advocacy's purpose, turning it into a tool for personal or social gain (Joyce, 2019; Meyer, 2020).

The consensus among netizens was that the behavior in question was predominantly characterized by rudeness. Some might argue that while respect for gender identity is crucial, Bacalso's response could be seen as overly punitive. While educating the waiter on the significance of using correct gender pronouns aligns with one's personal convictions, it is inappropriate to extend such lecture over an excessive duration.

Based on Bacalso's persistent use of defense mechanisms, including the posting of past videos where he speaks eloquently to seemingly project an image of intelligence, it can be inferred that he is experiencing cognitive dissonance.

When individuals have a self-image of being superior but are aware of their limitations, they might create a false image of intelligence to reduce the dissonance between their self-perception and reality. Festinger’s (1957) work on cognitive dissonance explores how individuals may alter their beliefs or behavior to align with their self-image.

This incident stands as a sobering reminder of the profound impact of individual actions on communities and the importance of accountability in maintaining societal integrity.

There is an urgent need for ethical behavior to flourish, anchored by a profound inner reflection and rigorous self-examination.

No comments:

Post a Comment