Friday, February 12, 2021

Incomplete

 (image: youtube.com)

Kalain anhi, yay ako Valentina/Valentino! A complain commonly heard by many as Valentine’s Day approaches. It is as if one is required to have someone during the exact date.  If s/he is single,  there must be a date and if the person is married (or “taken” as the pop culture terms it), s/he must be with the significant other to become “whole”. This perception or mentality was enforced by societal pressures and media campaigns as marketing strategies.

Romantics melted when Tom Cruise uttered “You complete me” in the 1996 hit movie Jerry Maguire to the character played by Renee Zellweger. Soon the sentiment became a litmus test of commitment and dedication in many relationships. People misconceived the concept of being “whole” by depending their happiness and contentment to another person.

Prewitt (2018) stated that the belief behind the sentiment could be dangerous. Many people assume “completion” is a goal in psychotherapy, yet that couldn’t be further from the truth. The goals of effective relationship therapy are centered on teaching two whole, healthy individuals how to be great partners to each other.

A mature and healthy love relationship says “I choose to enjoy my life and want to do so with you”. Stability in a relationship means happiness is an import instead of an export. The partners bring their happiness into the relationship to share, not expecting to extract happiness to fill their own deficits. Love and commitment come from finding someone you want to share your life with, not someone who you expect to give you a happy life.

Carl Jung says we marry our unconscious mind (or sub conscious) and then project our unresolved material onto our partner. Bruce Lipton in the book The Honeymoon Effect, talks about how most relationships start off with a place of imbalance, and we seek another to balance us.

But then, the selfish motive would rear its ugly head. You are looking for someone who “completes” you without any thinking that you will do the same to the other. The unconscious longing to make yourself whole and allowing another to do it will then become the source of conflict. When the individual demands to the partner to constantly “give” so to be complete, a cycle of selfishness happens. Imagine what happens when the other wants the same? Emotional vampires will be created.

One cannot pour from an empty cup. There is nothing to give if one doesn’t have it.

Self-love is a state of appreciation for oneself that grows from actions that support our physical, psychological and spiritual growth. Self-love means having a high regard for your own well-being and happiness. Self-love means taking care of your own needs and not sacrificing your well-being to please others.

Self-love is not simply a state of feeling good; it is an action. It is a choice. It is a way of relating to yourself that involves being understanding for your mistakes, understanding in your losses, and being able to effectively communicate with yourself about life without harshly judging or punishing yourself.

Research has shown that learning how to do self-love is associated with: Less anxiety and depression; Better recovery from stress;  An overall more optimistic outlook on life; and, better adherence to healthy behavior changes. In short, self-love is how you view yourself and how you treat yourself (psychologicalhealthcare.com).

It has been mentioned repeatedly that before one can journey towards others, s/he must journey first within the self. Low self-esteem or lack of self-love is something that could be developed in childhood and carry through to adulthood. Or, it is something that could present itself solely in adulthood. The person within must be in control of these deficits to prepare for a better relationship with others before committing to a relationship.

Ergo, make yourself WHOLE or COMPLETE first than allowing (or demanding) others to do it for your own sake.

According to Pollock (2019) Self Mastery is self-regulation or self-control, and it’s the ability to get yourself to consistently behave in ways that move you toward your goals rather than away from them. It’s the ability to set a course of action and keep moving forward no matter how hard it gets or how unmotivated you feel. It’s the ability to recognize and overcome your negative habits, so you can intentionally create the amazing life you’ve imagined.

It is self-centered to look for an “inspiration”. This concept sucks the goodness from the other person. It is better to be THE INSPIRATION so to give something which you already have: love, respect, compassion, understanding and many things more.

Instead of saying “You complete me,” say: We are both complete and it is time to share our completeness so to create a more peaceful and nurturing relationship.

Thursday, February 11, 2021

A Venture in the Dark Side

 

                                    (image: youtube.com)

In the quest of better understanding the SELF to attempt in mastering it, there are multiples studies to be delved into. The literature related to the topic is vast. Yet, this writer is gravitating to the concepts and theories of Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung.

One of the readings that can be titillating is this:

There in the horrors of prisons, lunatic asylums and hospitals, in drab suburban pubs, in brothels and gambling-hells, in the salons of the elegant, the Stock Exchanges, socialist meetings, churches, revivalist gatherings and ecstatic sects, through love and hate, through the experience of passion in every form in his own body, he would reap richer stores of knowledge than text-books a foot thick could give him, and he will know how to doctor the sick with a real knowledge of the human soul. -- Carl Jung (from "New Paths in Psychology", in Collected Papers on Analytic Psychology, London, 1916)

Jung rejected the tabula rasa theory of human psychological development. He proposed that thoughts, connections, behaviors, and feelings exist within the human race such as belonging, love, death, and fear, among others. These constitute what Jung called as "collective unconscious" and the concept of archetypes underpin this notion.

Along the way, these archetypes are embedded in the things that we can reflect. We can look deeper in us to understand the SELF better.

The Persona

The persona (or mask) is the outward face we present to the world. It conceals our real self and Jung describes it as the “conformity” archetype. This is the public face or role a person presents to others as someone different to who we really are (like an actor).

The Anima/Animus

Another archetype is the anima/animus. The “anima/animus” is the mirror image of our biological sex, that is, the unconscious feminine side in males and the masculine tendencies in women. Each sex manifests attitudes and behavior of the other by virtue of centuries of living together. The psyche of a woman contains masculine aspects (the animus archetype), and the psyche of a man contains feminine aspects (the anima archetype).

The Shadow

Next is the shadow. This is the animal side of our personality (like the id in Freud). It is the source of both our creative and destructive energies. In line with evolutionary theory, it may be that Jung’s archetypes reflect predispositions that once had survival value.

The Self

Finally, there is the self which provides a sense of unity in experience. For Jung, the ultimate aim of every individual is to achieve a state of self-hood (similar to self-actualization), and in this respect, Jung (like Erikson) is moving in the direction of a more humanist orientation.

The quest to become a better individual to be a person of the world is to realize his/her potential. Still, this writer is very much intrigued with The Shadow. This was awakened as the plot of Robert Louis Stevenson’s “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” was revisited.

There is a need to control The Shadow to arrive to the full potentials of The Self.

Friday, February 5, 2021

The Curse of Cupid

                                    (image: heraldmailmedia.com)

Nag-alingasa kay ya pay uyab! Sometimes, it is confusing why young people are being pressured to have a partner of sorts especially that February 14 is fast approaching. What is the psychology behind this? Are these people aware that they are being victimized by the marketing strategies of commercial institutions that the mentality stuck? You see, one can express love or be in a relationship anytime.

In 2020, prnewswire.com published “The Pressures of Valentine's Day & Dating” study which reveals that 43% of singles consider Valentine's Day to be the most pressure-filled day, with 1 in 5 wishing the event was canceled altogether.

The research also shows that on Valentine's Day, singles feel pressure to be romantic (51%), be in a relationship (43%), go on a date (42%), spend more money on gifts than they want to (37%), act like the holiday is meaningful (41%), or show others they have a Valentine (36%). Interestingly, the biggest pressures come from external sources tied to societal expectations (58%), commercialization and non-stop advertising of the big day (57%), and social media hype (48%).

Individuals with strong personalities understand that being pressured by the things they see and read can be a form of weakness. They stick on their own choices and be directed to where their visions of who they are geared. Reflective ones also look deeper on the reasons why people are “going with the flow”. They will then dichotomize things and arrive to conclusions and specific actions and NOT just “accept the facts”.

Whatever happened to the good old days of cutting out simple paper hearts, scarfing down a couple of powdery candies stamped with "Happy Valentine’s Day" on the side, and giving them to the parents and teachers? Nowadays, even TV stations are getting on shows offering special holiday centered programming and movies. And don't forget the restaurants offering a simple night out for two starting at discounted rates… so with hotels offering Valentine’s Day packages for lovers.

Around the end of the 5th Century, Pope Gelasius deemed February 14 as St. Valentine’s Day. The Catholic Church has three saints named Valentine or Valentinus – all martyrs, and all portrayed as a “sympathetic, heroic and, most importantly, a romantic figure.”

Dr. Gary Brown (2021) pointed that it took a few more centuries for St. Valentine’s Day to be connected with romance though, and in the Middle Ages it really kicked in. The first Valentines are reported to have been written in the 1400s. In the early 1700s, the practice of professing your love to another person in writing or deed picked up steam in the United States. And voila! Now it’s a multi-billion dollar industry and the 2nd largest gift-sending holiday!

The media has then portrayed the day in romanticized and idealized ways and has managed to put pressure on young people to be in a relationship or want a relationship. We have been inundated with images of cupids, fancy dinners, sunsets, and diamonds, and all this visual conditioning has created an expectation of what should be.  That formula has worked for marketers.  The industry generates more than 14 billion dollars in retail sales each year. 

Dr. Laura Brown says: “Love is not about a particular day, or about cards, flowers, or even being in a relationship. The illusion that coupled people are happy and well-loved can feed feelings of loneliness or isolation for people who aren't with someone, and wish they were. Seeing the illusory nature of this holiday can be the first step in feeling better about being precisely whom and where you are.”

According to Brown, the most important message that people should remember on Valentine's Day is that love is not just for couples or a select few; it is for all of us.

Valentine’s Day doesn’t mean anything at all except for the meaning we give it. The people who get the strongest reaction around it, good or bad, are really just looking for reassurance that they are loved through a made-up holiday. If you are single, you want a Valentine so you can feel lovable. You celebrate when you have a date (even if it is someone that you settled for just to get out for the evening) or you get down on yourself, if you spend the night alone. The same goes for couples who need a big hoopla or gift so their partner can prove their love. If he or she doesn’t follow through, it could be the cause of distress in the relationship, said Debi Berndt.

There is nothing wrong with being in love, giving gifts and be able to express one’s feelings. But why limit it to a single day? There are days when we can do such. We can displace love and affection any day of the year. And being pressured to have a significant someone during a day is a bit skewed. Where is the normalcy on looking for “anybody” just to feel OK?

Emotional strength is defined as ‘the ability to respond in an open and vulnerable way in the face of intense emotional experience, feeling one's way deeper into the emotion which allows access to implicit functional processes driving action’. The skill is to feel deeply into all emotion experience, opening up vulnerability and emotional responsiveness and to change the way emotion is understood in everyday life.

We need to be strong and not bend on outer pressures so to survive in this technology-driven and media-filled existence. We can spread love anytime and not just on a specific date. Let us not be stressed on particular concepts of happiness for it leads to depression.

Friday, January 29, 2021

Of Copycats and Copy-Pasting

                                             (image: youtube.com)
 

Yay kaugalingon  na hinimo, kinopya hurot. There is a big issue on originality at present. With information and concepts flourishing in any media portal, it seems that creativity is having its natural demise. Although others insist that they are doing original content, fact is, these contents are by-products of the trends and concepts created by some to have their tipping point. Commercial intentions are at the backbone of any trend or fad. Sometimes, there are outliers who just became accidentally become the talk of the town and are being copied by others. Yet, a lot is being tied to what is “in” and “how to be like you”.

In 1995, Steve Jobs was interviewed by Robert Cringely for the PBS documentary The Triumph of the Nerds. The future Apple CEO reflected on the notion that generating big ideas isn’t the same as bringing them to life in a valuable way. As he said, “There’s just a tremendous amount of craftsmanship in between a great idea and a great product.”

Content creation, according to conductor.com, is the process of identifying a new topic you want to write about, deciding which form you want the content to take, formalizing your strategy (keyword or otherwise), and then actually producing it.

From an outsider’s view, it can be easy to assume content creators simply generate imaginative ideas, write (or record) them, and then publish them as a blog post, email message, or other content piece. Yet, these “creators” are well-immersed with what tickles the mind of people. What ideas will sell and what concepts can resonate to the majority.

Then there came the pop culture’s so-called “influencers”. They are those who have the power to affect the purchasing decisions of others because of his or her authority, knowledge, position, or relationship with his or her audience.

Over the last decade, we have seen social media grow rapidly in importance. According to the January 2019 “We Are Social” report, 3.484 billion people actively use social media - that's 45% of the world’s population. Inevitably these people look up to influencers in social media to guide them with their decision making.

Influencers in social media are people who have built a reputation for their knowledge and expertise on a specific topic. They make regular posts about that topic on their preferred social media channels and generate large followings of enthusiastic, engaged people who pay close attention to their views (influencermarketinghub.com, 2021).

This is where creativity is at risk. Why think of something else when almost everything is given to us directly complete with the presentations that we prefer? Why read a book and commune with the creative minds of the writers when there are digested reviews for us? Why think of a new topic or create a new theory when almost all can be found using search engines?

Creativity allows us to view and solve problems more openly and with innovation. Creativity opens the mind. A society that has lost touch with its creative side is an imprisoned society, in that generations of people may be closed minded. It broadens our perspectives and can help us overcome prejudices (Carson, 2018).

Neuroscientists who study creativity have found that creativity does not involve a single brain region or even a single side of the brain, as the “right brain” myth of creativity suggests; instead, it draws on the whole brain. This complex process consists of many interacting cognitive systems (both conscious and unconscious) and emotions, with different brain regions recruited to handle each task and to work together as a team to get the job done.

Creativity is being tickled by a stimulus then a concept can be done. With this mindset, the mind works in a wide dimension and it starts to formulate, design and allow the concepts to be materialized. Influences can be there but the original mind creates its own product- an outcome considered as something novel, something new. It is not “copying” everything from the original concept and be dense enough to claim them their own.

Researchers think that, rather than making our living as innovators, human beings survive and thrive precisely because we don’t think for ourselves. Instead, people cope with challenging climates and ecological contexts by carefully copying others – especially those we respect. Instead of Homo sapiens, or “man the knower,” we’re really Homo imitans: “man the imitator.”

Studies indicate that those of lower education levels tend to copy those with higher education levels. It is hypothesized that this happens because they are trying to learn from those with more knowledge and experience than them. Copying someone with more knowledge can also help them to get further in the workplace. They may pick up some valuable skills they had no idea were crucial in your field of work.

But what would be imitated if no one creates? What will happen to the society when all people have to do is to copy and imitate what is happening around them?

Why is creativity important in everyday life? Betsy Roe (2012) said:  It is because it makes life infinitely interesting and fulfilling. Creativity is a way of living life that embraces originality and makes unique connections between seemingly disparate ideas. Creativity’s by-products are some of the major achievements of civilization–from the invention of the wheel to Mozart’s sonatas.

It is difficult to create something but we have to. Else, what is there to be excited about?

Friday, January 22, 2021

Over-Entertained

                
(image: youtube.com)        
Sobrahan da na paglingaw sa kaugalingon. Often, you observe people who are constantly looking for some kind of entertainment. Young ones complain about being bored all the time and gadgets like smart phones are used 98% to entertain them. Activities like viewing memes, laughing on viral vlogs and doing tiktok videos seem to be the fad. A lot of time used in the virtual world is all about entertainment.

We are always learning either deliberately or unconsciously. At each moment in time we are absorbing something into our brain, either we are picking up bad habits or good habits, or maybe taking in useful knowledge or useless knowledge, but we are learning nonetheless. That is why you may have heard people say ‘watch what goes in your brain.’

For a lot of people today, entertainment is a high priority, and they can’t go a day without it.

Shikati (2018) posited: Entertainment is the enemy of self-development and personal growth; it is the enemy of education. The moment you choose harmful or time wasting entertainment you place your personal education in the hands of content creators and you give them the power to educate you on whatever they want to feed you. In part, you also place the power to choose the direction in which your life is headed in the hands of someone else.

People spend more time with entertainment media than with any other activity outside of work. Yet given how ubiquitous it is, we have spent far too little effort learning about how entertainment media affects how we think and act.

Parents and policy makers are often inundated with frightening claims about media and technology’s effects on kids.  In 2014 one British newspaper compared playing video games to using heroin. In 2017, a headline in The Atlantic asked “Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?” Recently, there are claims that too much exposure to social media can create depression due to the highly studied FOMO (fear of missing out) theory.

Entertainment is not wrong. In fact, it creates balance in the lives of people. Yet, balance is not going to be attained when too much of it will be consumed. We must not let entertaining ourselves get along with our capacities and responsibilities. It is always wrong to become unproductive due to too much longing for entertainment.

Henry David Thoreau, as always, said it more eloquently than anybody: “A stereotyped, but unconscious despair is concealed under what are called the games and amusements of mankind. There is no play in them, for this comes after work.”

In 1787, Edward Gibbon completed his book, “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” giving the following reasons for its destruction: the rapid increase of divorce with the resultant undermining of the home; higher and higher taxes and the spending of public money for free circuses for the people; the mad craze for sports, which became more and more brutal; the building of gigantic armaments, when the real enemy was within, and the decay of religious faith, which faded into formalism and became impotent.

In short, Gibbon concluded that satisfying the desires of the people for comforts and entertainment became more important than their relationship with God and others.

How many family members are not speaking even if they are physically present and are stooped over their smart phones or laptops being “somewhere” else? How many friends prefer to play online games without even asking about their emotional well-being? How man online prayer gatherings are snubbed in lieu of Netflix and YouTube?

This is not to say that all entertainment is destructive or immoral. We need periodic breaks from the routines of life; time out from the daily grind. Jesus told His disciples to “come apart and rest awhile” (Mark 6:31), prompting someone to wisely observe that if we don’t come apart, we’ll come apart.

We must be reasonable enough to prioritize. This is the activity that arranges items or activities in order of importance relative to each other. There is a need for us to consider what is more important first then inject entertainment to create balance and productivity. If we are students, we can prioritize learning over entertaining memes and videos. If we are government workers, we can start with service rather than loafing.

Kids today, and really adults too, expect to be entertained all the time—even when they’re at school and work, observes Gregory Bloom, lecturer and author of Overcoming Entertainment Addiction: How to Cure Your Children of the Need to be Constantly Entertained (Action Publishing Group, 2006).

Amusement or fun addiction has an alarming rise among people today. “Behavioral” addictions have now been widely recognized as non-substance addictions (that can also develop with or without substance addictions). Neuro-imaging techniques and recent research show that it is not only alcohol and recreational drugs that are addictive. Behavioral addictions trigger the same fundamental responses in the body as, for example, cocaine (Grant et al., 2010).

In the end, it is the person to push himself towards that direction. A strong understanding of his/her action is needed for him to steer clear from the damaging effects of too much entertainment consumption.

Let us also create…not just consume.

 

Saturday, January 9, 2021

Whether Drunk or Not

 

                                     (image: youtbe.com)

Protektahan an bayong na baji. In line with the ongoing talks about the case of the flight attendant’s death during the New Year’s Eve party in a hotel in Makati City, a hashtag circulated in the social media sites which became the talk of the town when 2021 was ushered in. PROTECT DRUNK GIRLS seemed to be all over the media platforms which sometimes bring confusion to some.

Athena Presto posted her opinion on Rappler: The pushback against victim-blaming is a moral imperative. The reminder that getting drunk does not equate to consent can never be overstated – especially in a country where many use the idea of sexual harassment to tell women to cover up. However, we also need to remind each other to resist in a way that doesn't box women into being passive victims needing protection.

Women are not special beings that need to be shielded. Protecting women, especially in a patronizing and infantilizing way, distracts us from recognizing that women are human beings deserving of respect just like everyone else — drunk or otherwise.

Getting drunk is the decision of a person. Gone are the days when we blame peer pressure or whatever justifications that we have. It is the person who puts the alcohol in his/her body and most of the time not at gunpoint. It was scientifically proven that too much consumption of alcohol can either make one do unthinkable things due to intoxication. Thus, the mandate came to put labels on alcoholic beverages to “drink moderately” which later evolved to “drink responsibly”.

Both men and women are at risk of the dangers of being intoxicated by alcohol. It can produce detectable impairments in memory after only a few drinks and, as the amount of alcohol increases, so does the degree of impairment. Large quantities of alcohol, especially when consumed quickly and on an empty stomach, can produce a blackout, or an interval of time for which the intoxicated person cannot recall key details of events, or even entire events. This is according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

The campaign to “protect drunk girls” seem to romanticize getting drunk. According to startuprecovery.com, there can be any number of reasons that someone can begin to romanticize their time with alcohol. Going to the bar to blow off steam and constant advertisements tying alcohol’s use to happy, social gatherings, there can be many ways to receive mixed signals about drinking, even after they have experienced the highly destructive side of alcohol.

The long history of colonialism has embedded a patriarchal culture among Filipinos. The conception of women as full-time homemakers, as subordinated to men, violence against them is private, as reserve labor force, and as sexual objects is now being eroded by modern women asserting themselves in many aspects of life. But on the other hand, some are either marginalized, discriminated, or even exploited by the harsh realities of global economy and consumerism (Anonuevo, 2000).

Although the patriarchal culture persists, we now understand equality on both sexes. The 1987 Constitution states a prominent provision. The first in the Declaration of Principles Article II Section 14 asserted that "The State recognizes the role of women in nation-building and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men."

We need to frame sexual violence as something done by criminals than something that just happens to women. Taking the perpetrators out of the conversation makes it harder for us to demand accountability and justice. It has been more of "she was raped" than "they raped her" or "teach your daughter to say no" than "teach your sons that no means no." Reminding girls to stay safe is an inadequate response vis-à-vis clear manifestations of who we should be dealing with (Presto, 2020).

In management, Root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic process for identifying “root causes” of problems or events and an approach for responding to them. RCA is based on the basic idea that effective management requires more than merely “putting out fires” for problems that develop, but finding a way to prevent them. In cases similar to the much-discussed one over the flight attendant, we can see irresponsible drinking as the main culprit. Again, this writer does not blame the victim but the root of the problem. In excess, everything can be dangerous.

We can stop romanticizing alcohol intoxication.

So what then? Vince Ferreras of CNN Philippines reported on January 7, 2021: Four of flight attendant Christine Dacera's friends, who were also respondents in her case, recalled their final hours with her while celebrating New Year's Eve in a Makati hotel. In a press conference on Thursday, the respondents reiterated their innocence, saying Christine died of natural causes.

There are “unknown” and unpublished attacks on women, boys and children. These violent acts decompose the core of our society.

[Violence], says Rappler, happens to women because they are continuously rendered weak, no matter the circumstance. Fighting sexual violence does not need any qualifier — not drunk, not naked, not alone — especially when qualifiers contribute to the stigma against women who are independent and do not conform to gender norms.

Violence must not be treated indifferently. And all of us must be protected from it.

  

Saturday, January 2, 2021

Drunken Master

                                     (photo:councilonrecovery.org)

Parabayong! This is actually a term which is translated to ALCOHOLIC. Yet a lot of young people seem to take pride by being one. They are posting their drinking binges on social media like important events. Of course, we adhere to the understanding that “this is a free country” and “we are responsible for our own body” concepts but ADDICTION is a social malady. It is happening in the society and is slowly eating the morality and values of people.

Alcoholism, according to healthline.com, has been known by a variety of terms, including alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence. Today, it is referred to as alcohol use disorder. It occurs when you drink so much that your body eventually becomes dependent on or addicted to alcohol. When this happens, alcohol becomes the most important thing in your life.

People with alcohol use disorder will continue to drink even when drinking causes negative consequences, like losing a job or destroying relationships with people they love. They may know that their alcohol use negatively affects their lives, but it’s often not enough to make them stop drinking.

The symptoms that can lead to a diagnosis include drinking more alcohol than intended, failing to cut back on alcohol use, devoting substantial time and effort to drinking and recovering from drinking, strong cravings for alcohol, failing to fulfill obligations at work, school, or home, disengaging from relationships and activities, and developing tolerance or withdrawal, among others. Experiencing at least two symptoms throughout the course of a year merits a diagnosis, from mild to moderate to severe (Psychology Today).

Just like cigarette smoking or nicotine addiction, the target of alcohol addiction is usually the young people. Alcoholic drinks are lucrative businesses and the manufacturers make it sure that their products must have a set of clients so that business will continue to thrive.

Research shows that many adolescents start to drink at very young ages. In 2003, the average age of first use of alcohol was about 14, compared to about 17 1/2 in 1965. People who reported starting to drink before the age of 15 were four times more likely to also report meeting the criteria for alcohol dependence at some point in their lives. In fact, new research shows that the serious drinking problems (including what is called alcoholism) typically associated with middle age actually begin to appear much earlier, during young adulthood and even adolescence (Chen, Williams, et al, 2003).

In a survey conducted by the University of the Philippines in 1994, 60 per cent or 5.3 million Filipino youths are said to be drinking alcoholic beverages. About 4.2 million of them are males and 1.1 million are females. On the average, Filipino youths start drinking alcohol at the age of 16 or 17. Alcoholism across the Philippines in 2016, by gender and type is around 8.8 percent of males and 1.8 percent of females had alcohol use disorders.

The teenagers said their family, friends, and the mass media have influenced them to experiment with drinking alcohol. Underscoring the critical role that the family plays in youth behaviors, young people seem to take their cue from their own parents' attitudes and behavior. Thus, a boy who grows up with an alcoholic father is more likely to become one himself.

Mass media and the internet also play a great role in the marketing of alcohol. Beer and liquors in the Philippines are portrayed with positive images. Companies have varied strategies, depending on what market they want to target, focusing on basic Filipino values. For instance, beers and other alcoholic beverages have been associated with thirst quenching, male bonding, friendship and camaraderie, unity, youthfulness and fun among many others. Most common in the advertisements is the use of popular local action and sexy actors and actresses as their image models.

Why is it addictive? Physical addiction to alcohol is caused by the chemical response in the brain to it. Studies show that alcohol interacts with receptors in the brain called gamma-Amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors. These receptors stimulate opioid receptors in the brain, releasing chemicals called endorphins that cause pleasure or euphoria. Addiction to alcohol can also have a psychological cause when someone uses alcohol to cope with a psychological need. For instance, someone who feels unhappy may use alcohol to cope with that unhappiness (Williams, 2020).

Most of the literature on alcoholism suggests that the reasons are genetics, external or peer pressure and personality (those who think that drinking makes them socially-accepted).

What are the risk factors? Jurgen Rehm (2011) mentioned that alcohol is a necessary underlying cause for more than 30 conditions and a contributing factor to many more. The most common disease categories that are entirely or partly caused by alcohol consumption include infectious diseases, cancer, diabetes, neuropsychiatric diseases (including alcohol use disorders), cardiovascular disease, liver and pancreas disease, and unintentional and intentional injury.

Many teens do not have the mental capacity to fully understand the consequences of drinking or even be aware of them. Teens can face immediate negative consequences, such as brain damage and delayed puberty. Indirect health issues, such as car crashes and sexual assaults, are also common problems from drinking.

Still, we see an alarming increase of youngsters displaying their “seemingly normal” drinking binges and drunken acts on social media. It takes a lot of good parenting, education and morality development for them to lead a healthier life ahead.

If the parents, schools and religious denominations do not condemn such addiction, the future might be bleak plagued with sick and dysfunctional individuals.